RobertLynn Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
Evan Baines wrote:
There's an old photo school exercise for white on white, where you shoot an egg on a white background. One of the points of the exercise is that
1) True white lacks detail
2) We are programmed to want to see the foreground object as brighter than the background most of the time.
3) Thus, in order to convey something that registers to our eyes as white-on-white, you typically want the background to be a slightly darker (but still bright) gray than the foreground object. If the foreground object is darker than the background, it registers as dingy.
Its a tightrope act, but as a general rule I think you might have better luck with "white" on "white" if you ease off on the background light a bit and let it fall off to gray just a smidge. It will still register to the eye as a white background, even if its actually just a light gray. It may not be the only way to do it, but its the "tried and true." As Steady said, though... exposure can be a matter of taste.
Evan, wow! I never knew about that exercise and I'm going to try it when I'm feeling better.
I love checking out other folks work, then reading the replies. I learn a lot from it too.
|