Just trying to scan in the film version of this now, i'll have to take it down to a proper place to do it justice though, soemthing tells me my little V500 isnt going to be best for it!
Yeah the pano is better, but the comp/crop could be different. The waterfall is too centred and you have nice growth on the rocks that you have not really presented. The left 1/3 of the photo is not adding much, maybe crop it out? Is it easy to achieve hyperfocal with this camera and do a nice closeup of the rocks with the fall in the BG and keep it all sharp?
Spyro P. wrote:
Yeah the pano is better, but the comp/crop could be different. The waterfall is too centred and you have nice growth on the rocks that you have not really presented. The left 1/3 of the photo is not adding much, maybe crop it out? Is it easy to achieve hyperfocal with this camera and do a nice closeup of the rocks with the fall in the BG and keep it all sharp?
Hyperfocal isnt really easy with that lens, it was stoped down to f45 and still you only get ~3m-inf in focus (even when hyperfocaled), so its not the best when you've got rocks 3 feet in front of the lens!
I might play around with the crop after i get it scanned properly.
