David Israel Offline Image Upload: On
|
p.1 #11 · looking for a wide angle lens | |
I own and use the:
Sigma 12-24
Canon EF 16-35 mkII
and have owned and used the: Canon EF-S 10-22
I absolutely loved the 10-22. It was very sharp, controlled flare remarkably well given how wide it is and produced great colors. If you are sure that you will not require a lens for 1.3 crop factor of full frame, it will be very hard to beat the performance of this lens.
The Sigma 12-24 is an amazing bargain. It is a rectilinear lens and is surprisingly good for how wide it is. Flare is a bit more of a problem than with the 10-22, albeit on a FF body versus the 10-22's 1.6 CF body performance (so we are not comparing apples to apples).
The EF 16-35 mkII is also a great performer and I own it for when I need the speed. However, I would exchange it in a heartbeat for a 14 2.8 mkII (still on my wish list). Keep in mind that the 16-35 costs more than twice as much as the other two lenses.
I wish that I was at home so that I could look on my HD to find examples from each lens, taken wide open. Afterall, a picture says a thousand words.
If you don't need the 2.8 aperature, the Sigma is quite amazing. So, my recommendation is as follows:
If you are staying with the CF, the 10-22 would be very hard to beat. I don't know how much money the Tokina and Tamron lenses cost, but the Canon is simply hard to beat at it's price.
If you may be going FF or 1.3 CF in the future, you may want to invest in the Sigma 12-24 as it is a stellar performer and a real steal at it's current price.
If you must have f/2.8, consider the 16-35.
Good luck in your search and....Merry Christmas!
|