thebac1 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I'd like to join the chorus here, too--I just picked the first three posts selling lenses and compared the asking price on the board to the B&H price for a new US lens; these are the percentages that I came up with:
Lens 1: 95%
Lens 2: 81% (reduced from 87%)
Lens 3: 89%
In fairness, the B&H price does not include shipping (or tax, if you're in NY)
However, the FM price often does not yet include shipping or PP fee, either.
Also, you could knock a few bucks off the B&H price by buying used from KEH or B&H, or buying a grey import from B&H (with one-year warranty).
Also, you're getting a real warranty. Unless you're buying a Canon lens, you're also forgoing several years of warranty coverage (Nikon: 5 years, Tamron: 6 years, Sigma: 4 years). Even with Canon, a new lens will get you a one-year warranty, a used lens will get you at best the balance on the one-year warranty.
FWIW, all three are Canon lenses (none of them include extras, and one of them is the lens and caps only), and for whatever reason they retain their value much better than Nikon or the third-party guys. Still not a good deal if you ask me.
Also, I saw someone post a lens/filter combo for sale at $400 which he bought at $250. Is it really that surprising that it's not selling? It's since been marked down twice, with the current asking price 6.25% lower than the original asking price.
This brings me to my second point--what's with people pointing out that the PRICE was REDUCED? If you have to reduce your price because you asked too much originally, it's still a bad deal. If you reduce your price from $1025 to $1010 on a lens that costs $1150 new with five-year warranty at B&H, that's still a bad deal. I don't care that the price was reduced, I care what the price is now.
|