Randy Walton Offline Buy and Sell: On
|
p.1 #23 · Early morning at Rock Creek Lake (4) | |
phil hawkins wrote:
Holy Crap! The first one is really good! The last one doesn't look natural.. The HDR looks way off to me... Sky is too dark in relation to the foreground... And the mountains have a halo, and are light at the bottom and conspicuously dark at the top. But that first one is excellent!!
Phil, I'm glad you liked the first image. The 4th I knew would be subjectively reviewed. However the light other than the foreground rocks which were lighted in PS with curves, as you can see in the original raws is pretty much true. The sun was just rising over the mountains to my almost immeadiate left and the tops of the mountain in the bg were darker at the top, just the way it was. As far as looking natural, as I mentioned that is not my upmost concern. I think too many people continue to stand in a hallway when it comes to creative processing. Plus if you think about it, is this any less natural than stars going in circles? There are no halos in any of the images, original, hdr, or blends. Even a 300%, you may be misconstruing light with halos. Thanks for your comments!
night86mare wrote:
i think #1 is extremely beautiful.
#4 is overdone in my book - i appreciate what hdr can do, but here you have lost sight of the correct hierachy of light - how can your rocks be brighter (or as bright as) than the sky?!
Glad you liked the first image young man. Your opinion and critique on the 4th was expected by me from some. All I can say about the light is that other than some additional lightening on the foreground rocks the light is actually pretty much true to the scene. Again by design, my image was processed not to necessarily represent the scene as totally natural. Unlike most of you I merely mention the fact when HDR is used and don't try an conceal it. 
kschweichhart wrote:
I like first and second one, Randy.
Karl
Thanks Karl, glad you like those two. 
|