Tariq Gibran Online Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.4 #6 · Oly 28/2...how does it stack up? | |
Are you sure you have a 24-40 Zuiko sitting on your shelf? Have you actually used it? All kidding aside, who knows? I suppose there is that chance and, after all, we do know that your later 28 3.5 coating looks different than the earlier versions. The 28 3.5's I owned also looked like yours with that nice, rich magenta/amber reflection. I do have older lenses such as the Nikkor 20 UD I mentioned that also give that Magenta/Amber reflection and that is a lens known to not be multi coated.

cogitech wrote:
Tariq Gibran wrote:
"But there is not a single reported example by anyone nor in any Olympus literature of there ever existing a 28 3.5 with a ring which read MC. So that pitfall is out completely."
"...as stated by Olympus themselves. One would think Olympus would know."
Tariq, while I can see that your arguments are as valid as mine on this issue, the above quotes are troublesome.
Why?
Because Olympus Japan also has no record of ever producing an MC Zuiko 24-40 f4 lens and I have one sitting on my shelf.
So, it would be putting it lightly to state that Olympus's record keeping is lackluster. If they can't keep track of a lens that they made, how can we expect that coating variations were documented accurately (or at all).
Knowing what I know, I still think it is entirely possible that my 28/3.5 has upgraded coatings (even if not MC) over older versions of the 28/3.5.
After all, if I own a lens that Olympus has no record of, I find it entirely possible that I have a 28/3.5 with coatings that Oly has no record of.
|