Rockies Photo Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #10 · how do canon users transfer their images to the computer? | |
Pre-Face: This is not a pissing match, just providing accurate data.
keithreeder wrote:
Firewire 800 was slightly faster than high-speed USB 2.0, but not to the extent that would make buying a Firewire card worthwhile.
Interesting.... FW800 on my MBP & iMac is more than twice as fast, than USB 2.0 is, when downloading the same card, with the exact same information.
keithreeder wrote:
And Firewire 400 is significantly slower than USB 2.0.
I believe you are mistaken with regard to this statement.
Again, I have simultaneously downloaded twin cards on USB 2.0 & FW400 at the same time, and each time the FW400 completed the task' faster, than USB. USB is rated at 480 Megabits, FW is rated at 400 Megabits. However, FW is constantly streaming the data, whereas, USB is sending the data in blocks of information. I have never actually heard of USB hitting 480/MB...
I used to be a USB 2.0 Faithful user, until, I added a FW400 PCI card to my WinXP desktop. Then I bought the Sandisk FW Reader. Then I started dumping 4 & 8GB cards full of Raw Images, and noticeably saw the difference between USB & FW. Then I bought a Macbook Pro, and truly saw the difference between FW400/1394a & USB 2.0....
Here is a quote from Wikipedia, which is quoted from PC Magazine, TechTV, & other sources: LINK
"Although similar in theoretical maximum transfer rate, FireWire 400 tends to have the performance edge over USB 2.0 Hi-Speed in real-world uses, especially in high-bandwidth use such as external hard-drives.[19][20][21][22] The newer FireWire 800 standard is twice as fast as FireWire 400 and outperforms USB 2.0 Hi-Speed both theoretically and practically."
Stepping down from the Podium.....
To the OP:
I use Card Readers. I have never bent an interface pin in 5+ years of using Digital SLR's & Card Readers. And as has been stated, if you actually bend a pin, just take a small flat head screw driver and bend it back into place.
|