georgefun99 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I really prefer the 5D-II (or Nikon D700) but my current financial situation just does not allow either. I am upgrading for the AF micro-adjustment, LCD (eyes getting worse at age 50), higher MP for better detail and cropping ability.The photo above doesn't prove the point mentioned in the text, I can easily see the higher detail in the 50D image, that's just what I am looking for.
I currently accept the probability that noise and high ISO performance will be similar or just slightly improved over the 40D, which is a decent accomplishment with 50% more pixels in the same area. I wish I could trust the bold predictions by Canon about improved ISO and focus speed/accuracy, but they said the same about the 40D and it was only a slight improvement over the 20D I used to own.
Two more reasons I am getting the 50D instead of the 5D-II, my 17-55 2.8 IS and Tokina 11-16 2.8 crop lenses are fantastic. There is no full frame equivalent to the 17-55 until Canon makes an IS version of the 24-70L, and the 16-35L costs almost 3X what the Tokina did.
The 50D makes sense for me right now, next year could be very different.
|