hmm....whatever, this evening I have lost my photography skill and forgot how to take picture, I can't seems to find the shutter button so I start punching my camera, it made a few click click click noise and all pictures came out severely under-exposed or completely blown, so I refuse to take any more snapshot until I can get my hand on the 60D, I don't care that you don't care, I want my 60D RIGHT NOW so I can kicks ass in photography again!!!
My friend you are full of assumptions about the new canon cameras (all negative) Why don’t you wait until we have them in hand ( or at least a real test) - What is your purpose? I THINK you may have a very large serving of crow coming-
Maybe the 5DMII will surpass your 1DsM3 IQ. ha
T
I am getting on your nerves, don't I..? Take a pill
You don't remember Canon making a D60? Life was better with the old D60 - slow, yes. But, beautiful pics - 6 megapixels was good enough and I got some really satisfying photos from it. Ahh .. then the upgrade bug bit me. And now I have become a gearhead.
Un-troll me quick! I was talking about the Canon D60.
I took the OP and subsequent posts by yauyi to be tongue in cheek and humorous. The fact that people are actually getting bent out of shape over such a post is mildly amusing as well.
I suppose people compensate with their wallets, much like short fat bald men drive lifted gas guzzling SUV's with obnoxiously loud tail pipes - Yes, you need attention, we get it.
((((((((((((((I have some short fat bald friends and not one has a gas guzzling SUV's this is a lame statement Oh by the way I am not short and I am not fat but I have a ton of hair and I don't have a gas guzzler))))))))))))
Maybe they should look at some photo history books and feel bad (or maybe even inspired?!?) comparing their $10k+ trail of cameras to what some people shot on film with cameras that lacked auto focus and meters.
Don't get me wrong, if you get your jollies by geeking out and pixel peeping and "getting the best image quality" that you can afford for your candid shots of your dog running around in the grass and your cousins ugly baby, take joy from the wads of cash you are giving to Canon. I love you for it, it means someday, maybe in a few years, when my camera can no longer be repaired, they'll have enough of your money for R&D to make more great cameras.
The message is, enjoy photography. Photography is great. Art is great. Expression is great. Memories are great.
But if your enjoyment stems for spending vast amounts of money on the latest greatest gizmo, maybe take up a new hobby, like, seeing how many starving childen in Africa you can feed. It will be much more rewarding. Maybe you can send me a $1 pinhole camera and discover something amazing in them.
(((((((((((((Why not supply birth control? Also what is so wrong with helping the hungry people right here in the states there are many. Also what makes you think these people aren't donating money?))))))))))))
saaketham wrote:
You don't remember Canon making a D60? Life was better with the old D60 - slow, yes. But, beautiful pics - 6 megapixels was good enough and I got some really satisfying photos from it. Ahh .. then the upgrade bug bit me. And now I have become a gearhead.
Un-troll me quick! I was talking about the Canon D60.
There's only one way to deal with trolls - acid or fire. Denying your foul allegiance to Bezelbub only makes it worse.
BigJoe wrote:
I took the OP and subsequent posts by yauyi to be tongue in cheek and humorous. The fact that people are actually getting bent out of shape over such a post is mildly amusing as well.
I'm not all serious. Or, I'm not serious at all....hmm.
Supplying birth control is a failure. Lets just keep stupid people from reproducing. As for the SUV comment, you have heard of compensation, yes? Maybe your friends and yourself are comfortable with yourselves, maybe you're also comfortable with using your camera as a tool instead of pissing and moaning for the latest greatest gadget .
Why the extra bits? They would only bloat the file size, and decrease the frame rate. 21MP would be overkill on an APS-C sensor, if the 50D is any indication at all.
yauyi wrote:
2) 4" SVGA LCD
Not a real functional improvement IMHO. Certainly not a reason for a new body, although every improvement is of course nice.
yauyi wrote:
3) 8fps
Because the gulf between 6.5 and 8 FPS is so huge... How many Digic IV processors do you reckon would be needed for 8 FPS at 21 MP and 16 bits?? Do you think you're being rational about this?
yauyi wrote:
4) fully weather sealed
Does that make a big difference in your shooting? I'm curious.
Take a pill 
?
