We know that there are some happy new owners out there and others are going to get their new 50D in the following days. So please post your first samples and impressions. Thanks.
ulrikft wrote:
(this is, a rethorical question.. The people addicted to new gear may be annoying, those religiously defending older gear are by far worse though).
It's not about defending older gear. It's about do you _really_ need new gear.
ocean7 wrote:
It's not about defending older gear. It's about do you _really_ need new gear.
Define "need". That is the hard and crushing starting point of the debate you seem to want to start. I won't hijack this thread any further, so if you want, you can start a new thread or send me a msg. I'm actually very interested in what you think "needs" means in this context
Breitling65 wrote:
Seriously, I saw some OK high ISO shots, but what is wrong with even 20D-40D to do same? G7 might be not as good example in this case.
I have a 30d and I have published magazine sized images at iso 1600, I have also seen olympus om1-shots that print well to 20x30 inches.. It is just a moot point
ulrikft wrote:
(this is, a rethorical question.. The people addicted to new gear may be annoying, those religiously defending older gear are by far worse though).
