Sean Mills
Offline
Image Upload: On
|
Cableaddict wrote:
Sean,
You evidently have not been reading the various 5DII threads. Perhaps you missed the vast majority of negative posts, from the incredble number of people (mostly 5D and 1-series owners) who are dissapointed in this offering.
Or perhaps you currently own a Rebel. 
The kiddies should stay off this thread. The 3D will not be for them, anyway.
-----------------------------------
And BTW- it's not nearly double the resolution. That would require 4X the number of pixels. -Not that most folks even care about the extra pixels, which is exactly part of the problem.
I don't own a rebel, and need not concede to others opinions. And perhaps you've missed the number of posts of people happy for what the camera is, and will be for them. I'm just dandy with my 1ds3, thanks for asking, but would not mind one bit a 5d2 as more compact back up or walk around cam.
Take 2 5D frames and marry them, you have 24MP, this is what I was referring to, nearly double the number of pixels. You are referring to LINEAR resolution, in which case, yes, it would require FOUR times the AREA. I was referring to square area... which it is. 4sq ft is twice as many sq ft as 2sq ft... vernacular would appear to be your problem in this situation.
If a 3D surfaced, I would be thrilled.... you don't hear me knocking so called 'lower models'. Horses for courses, the 5D was never destined to be the performance cam you are rabbling for. It's a tool of the deliberate. If that's not you, get a different body and stop polluting the forum with negativity, it's just old. A Rebel isn't for me, but it doesn't 'suck' takes great pictures in the right hands in the right circumstances... just like any other camera, including the 5D2.
|
... it's 919 now. 