Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Reviews · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
What are the criteria?
FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Image Upload
end
Go to previous topic Go to next topic
G. Todd Kalif
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #1 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


I took my camera to the New York Botanical Garden's Henry Moore exhibit. Here are three pairs of pics--the first in each pair is a whole-statue view, the second a different perspective. I need comments and suggestions for them--especially the second of each pair. Thanks for viewing and for your feedback (as a regular in the sports corner, I'm used to serious criticism).




Exif information
Model Canon EOS 30D
Date 2008:08:08 22:18:31
Original date 2008:08:06 13:25:15
Exposure time 1/800 sec
Focal length 22mm
Focal number f/4.0
ISO speed 250 ISO
Exposure compensation 0.0






Exif information
Model Canon EOS 30D
Date 2008:08:08 22:17:28
Original date 2008:08:06 13:29:37
Exposure time 1/1250 sec
Focal length 85mm
Focal number f/5.6
ISO speed 250 ISO
Exposure compensation 0.0



Aug 12, 2008 at 04:30 PM
G. Todd Kalif
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #2 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


#2




Exif information
Model Canon EOS 30D
Date 2008:08:12 12:32:15
Original date 2008:08:06 13:48:06
Exposure time 1/320 sec
Focal length 17mm
Focal number f/10.0
ISO speed 250 ISO
Exposure compensation 0.0






Exif information
Model Canon EOS 30D
Date 2008:08:08 22:18:14
Original date 2008:08:06 13:47:40
Exposure time 1/500 sec
Focal length 17mm
Focal number f/10.0
ISO speed 250 ISO
Exposure compensation 0.0



Aug 12, 2008 at 04:34 PM
G. Todd Kalif
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #3 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


#3




Exif information
Model Canon EOS 30D
Date 2008:08:08 22:18:58
Original date 2008:08:06 15:22:24
Exposure time 1/100 sec
Focal length 35mm
Focal number f/9.0
ISO speed 250 ISO
Exposure compensation 0.0






Exif information
Model Canon EOS 30D
Date 2008:08:08 22:18:45
Original date 2008:08:06 15:21:32
Exposure time 1/250 sec
Focal length 17mm
Focal number f/9.0
ISO speed 250 ISO
Exposure compensation 0.0



Aug 12, 2008 at 04:36 PM
Louis_Chr
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #4 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


I like number 4 the best. I believe number 3 would be a better shot without the small children in the picture. I am thinking to myself as I was typing, probably not politically correct to say something about not having children in a picture.


Edited on Aug 12, 2008 at 05:31 PM


Aug 12, 2008 at 05:28 PM
G. Todd Kalif
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #5 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


Thanks for the feedback! My wife will be forever in your debt--that's her in the background and she's 5'8", to give you an idea of the size of these sculptures!

Aug 12, 2008 at 05:47 PM
AuntiPode
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #6 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


It's difficult to make interesting photographs of sculpture in a garden. Most ordinary views, the kind anyone can take as a snapshot without laying in the grass or climbing a tree, usually seem ho hum. Snap shots may accurately depict a piece of sculpture, but they are at best "record" shots. If you are reporting on a new exhibition in a park, then reportage shots are appropriate. If you want to say something about the sculpture, then you need to find your own special vision of what you see and go beyond an ordinary snapshot style. Naturally, having suggested this, someone may pipe in with "What if you want to express an Aunt Millie snapshot style as your message?" I leave that as an exercise for the reader to ponder.

Of the first pair I prefer the second, but the composition is weak to my taste. To the extent it works for me, it's because the sculpture provides a supporting background. With the flowers as the message, saying perhaps "mother nature's beauty exceeds the works of man", it would be an easier message to sell if the flowers were a larger part of the image.

The second shot of the second pair is moderately more interesting to me because it wasn't quite a typical static snapshot. The trees in the background however were distracting and would have been better out of focus. The second shot of the second pair shot was interesting to me because you selected an interesting shape. However, again the pine trees in the background detract from the abstract shape to my eyes. A wider aperture to throw the branches out of focus might have helped.

As always, consider my comments in the light of what you paid for them.

Aug 12, 2008 at 10:04 PM
G. Todd Kalif
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #7 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


Thanks, Karen-- Your philosophy and your expressions of taste are much appreciated. I purposely did not put the trees out of focus in the fourth picture, as I was trying (in both photos, by the way) to include the NYBG with the sculpture.

Aug 13, 2008 at 03:09 AM
Scott Stoness
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #8 · Henry Moore at the NYBG


Like 1b and 2a the best.

1a seems too light.

1b with slight shift to right to get rid of bush on left would be better

2a without the people woudl be better

2b is well exposed for such challenging background - I think a better backgroudn woudl be better - it does not complement. Maybe more bokeh

3 a does not work for me with too light behind.

3b is good but sky instead of trees woudl be better for me.

Nice shots.

Aug 14, 2008 at 11:43 PM

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Image Upload
end
  Go to previous topic Go to next topic

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost password?