Stu Warner Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.2 #3 · Still happy with a 10D??? | |
I still shoot with a 300D as a primary camera, and since this was basically a dummed-down 10D I feel I am in some position to comment.
Basically the technology IS very old now. No getting away from that. This generation of cameras are slow in every way, and the high ISO performance is pretty poor in comparison to today's standards. However, with your 10D you have much better build and ergonomics than the rebel range. If you are working with a tight budget and build quality is VERY important for you, and you shoot at least 90% of shots bellow ISO400, I say go with a 10D. If you want better review/write times, quicker startup, better ISO performance, lighter weight, etc, then go with one of the recent rebels or even consider the brand new sub-Rebel 1000D. I haven't checked out the 1000D, but I expect it to be severely lacking in features but with high ISO performance that the 10D/300D could only dream about. Whilst you may like the idea of having identical operation on both bodies, there is also something to be said about having two different bodies with complementary features, so that you can decide which is most appropriate for a particular shot and play to a particular camera's strong points....e.g. sports, or low light, or travel, or rugged build in harsh environments, or comfort in hand for extended shooting...etc
The best of both worlds (handling and performance) on a limited budget would be the 20D if you can swing the extra expense. That would be my recommendation... save for a couple more months, wait for 20D owners to upgrade to the new 5DmkII, and buy a used 20D.
Edited on Aug 13, 2008 at 08:07 AM
|