Karl Witt Offline Image Upload: On
|
p.2 #7 · Flutterby Butterflies....(10) | |
Anti Matter wrote:
Very nice series, Karl!! Other's here have suggested you need more depth of field, and I agree to a certain extent. If you go too deep, you run the risk of rendering a rather flat looking image, and even having the background interfere. As you point out, it's all part of the learning curve, and sometimes it's simply a matter of personal taste.
And if there's one thing I have learned it's that it is nigh on impossible to get a butterfly in absolutely pristine condition!! Virtually every one I've shot has had wings that were either frayed or had obvious chunks bitten out of them, and everything in between. Some are so messed up, I can't believe they can still fly!!
Frank
Apparently Shasoc (Socrate) has all the perfect ones Or at least we don't know any better It is good when things don't go as planned, makes you try a lot harder next time! There wasn't much room to work, very few subjects and not a heavily planted area to have good BG and the darn screening sure didn't look good as a BG. Anyhow, a great lesson, and certainly well worth it.
Thanks much for commenting!
Karl
|