jamesf99 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #12 · D700: Canon breathe sigh of relief. | |
Stunnaz wrote:
Would you guys be satisfied if the 5D2 has the exact same specs as the 1Ds3 but 16MP? Seems like people are expecting the 5D2 to trump the 1Ds3 but cost $2,000. Expectations for the 5D2 are too high and impossible to fulfill. I mean, are you guys okay with the camera only going up to ISO3200?
It's looking like either the 5D2 fails expectations or the 1Ds3 owners will feel pretty stupid for paying $8,000 for their camera.
"Expectations for the 5D2 are too high and impossible to fulfill"
You're right "in theory" and I agree with you, but....
and it's a huge BUT....
It's long past time for adjustments in the markets AND expectations. Canon has "had their way" with the public for years and is charging $8k for what exactly? A sensor in a sub $4k body.....
http://cameras.pricegrabber.com/digital/m/35859610/st=sort/sort_type=price
What many new comers to the photography world don't understand is that the cost of these cameras is for the most part dramatically out of touch with production costs. If Nikon can put all their high end professional features (except VF) and PAY someone else to mfg the sensor, and then sell it profitably for $3k, people darned well should start expecting a LOT more for their money. They absolutely should start expecting Canon to release a good, working product (unlike previous fiascos) and if that has to start with the 5d2, all the better.
Canon has had a field day with the markets and only fools think there's any justification for it today. A 1D3 replacement with a 16.5MP sensor, (working AF), improved UDMA performance, better LCD, improved LV focus, etc. should be priced no higher than $4k full retail at release IMO. A 1ds3 (with all the other decent features Canon "forgot" to include" should sell for $5-$5.5K, or a $1,000 or $1500 premium for the sensor (if they can get away with it). Besides the sensor (and dust shaker nonsense), the 1Ds3 is only equal and in many ways inferior to the Nikon D3, now selling around $4k+.
Expecting value is not just an crazy idea, it's something that everyone should be demanding, regardless if that individual will ever be able to afford a $4k or $8k camera.
Edited by jamesf99 on Jul 22, 2008 at 10:51 AM GMT
Edited on Jul 22, 2008 at 03:51 PM
|