"Admirable" blur samples

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Image Upload
1 2

4 … 93 94 end

Ariithka
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #1 · "Admirable" blur samples

Olympus Trip 35 w/ 40mm Zuiko f2.8

This image is copyrighted by the owner

OM Zuiko 50mm 1.8 + 40D

No PP
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Fair amount of PP including clarity tool.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 04, 2008 at 07:27 AM

Sirfishalot
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #2 · "Admirable" blur samples

Pentax SMC FA*250-600/5.6

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Pentax SMC FA*80-200/2.8

This image is copyrighted by the owner

JayT

Jul 04, 2008 at 09:13 AM

Mike Ganz
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #3 · "Admirable" blur samples

Taken with Sigma 150/2.8 EX DG HSM Macro on 5D:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Edited by Mike Ganz on Jul 04, 2008 at 12:19 PM GMT

Edited by Mike Ganz on Jul 04, 2008 at 12:54 PM GMT

Edited on Jul 04, 2008 at 06:54 PM

Jul 04, 2008 at 05:22 PM

telyt
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #4 · "Admirable" blur samples

A few samples made with the Leica 280mm f/4 APO-Telyt, all at f/4:

Edited by telyt on Jul 05, 2008 at 09:53 AM GMT

Edited on Jul 04, 2008 at 10:53 PM

Jul 04, 2008 at 05:53 PM

Andi Dietrich
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #5 · "Admirable" blur samples

Jonas B wrote:
Andi Dietrich posted a 50mm zf image:

That is an, to my eyes, appealing image. I like the curve the leave (or what it is) describes and how the light and tone is changed when it meets the curtain. The focus is not at the center petals but I guess there is a reason for that. I like this image.

Technically I would describe the bokeh as decent but not stellar. The curtain isn't gently rounded off but there are distracting lines at the bottom end of it and the salt and pepper cellars are also a little distracting (the bright bottoms).

Thanks, actually the focus is on the center, its even sharp enough 200% uprezzed, amazing it still has what people describe as zeiss 3D

This image is copyrighted by the owner

What is wrong with the bokeh, not enough blur?

Jul 04, 2008 at 10:33 PM

PSquared63
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #6 · "Admirable" blur samples

How about a double blur? Background blur and motion blur from panning.

Canon 1Ds3 + Leica 280/4 + 1.4x APO

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 05, 2008 at 06:48 AM

Jonas B
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #7 · "Admirable" blur samples

JayT, the Pentax SMC FA*80-200/2.8, and its shorter sibling, are good examples of lenses loved by many and at the same time leaving others, like me, cold.
After having followed the discussion in this thread and in the Siggy 50 thread it is clear that some don't actually like smooth (or silky or buttered or...) backgrounds.

Jul 05, 2008 at 09:43 AM

Jonas B
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #8 · "Admirable" blur samples

Andi Dietrich wrote:
posted this wonderful image

This image is copyrighted by the owner

(and then asked)
What is wrong with the bokeh, not enough blur?

Hi Andi,

I don't say anything is right or wrong about bokeh. In the end blurriness has to be about taste and to my taste your delicious image would have been yet better with smotther highlights, as mentioned. Don't read in anything else in my comment - it is all personal.

regards,

Jul 05, 2008 at 09:48 AM

koenrutten
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #9 · "Admirable" blur samples

I think it's mostly about the relative subject to background distance, lens quality is a close second.
Sigma 24-70 F/2.8 EX @ F4 on eos 1d mk1
This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 05, 2008 at 09:48 AM

Jonas B
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #10 · "Admirable" blur samples

A processed one with the Pentax FA31/1.8:

Jul 05, 2008 at 09:51 AM

Jonas B
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #11 · "Admirable" blur samples

koenrutten wrote:
I think it's mostly about the relative subject to background distance, lens quality is a close second.

Worried (?) faces, nice image.
I agree about the "relative distance" -factor. Then the strong second "lens quality" in some cases can make a good image instead of a mediocre or worse one as another lens would have done in the exact same situation.

The original post is updated.

Jul 05, 2008 at 09:56 AM

robsteve
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #12 · "Admirable" blur samples

You can't forget the Noctilux, king of Bokeh

These two are at f1.0

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Close up using an extension tube. I think it may have been f1.2.

Jul 05, 2008 at 12:44 PM

brainiac
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #13 · "Admirable" blur samples

Jonas B wrote:
For Braniac; some Leica samples that may be edgy enough?

Thanks a lot Jonas. Just found the thread. I think it really is a matter of taste. Having said that, there are circumstances where few will like the bokeh. Personally I'm not too keen on the lack of 3D in your very well taken bluebell shots. A number of Leica lenses I have tried have looked like that. They probably aren't all like that though. Very rich colour, smooth bokeh and a painted look are what some people are looking for. It really depends how you want your pictures to look.

Spyro's hydrant shot is wonderful, but I suspect that more often that lens's bokeh is intrusive. Asabet's godzilla boy is, I think, an example of bokeh detracting from a great picture. The Nikon f1.2 shot of the dog seems problematic too. So I have no doubt that harsher bokeh can spoil a shot, for me.

On the other hand, there are some shots of very smooth bokeh here which seem to have no impact as a result. I think there is a fine line between smooth/boring/flat and harsh/informative/serendipitous. There are special lenses which I think one can rely on to produce pretty and intersting bokeh. The Rokkor 58 f1.2 seems to manage to do both. So do the Oly 40 f2 and Canon 200 f1.8.

Jul 05, 2008 at 12:48 PM

Pixel Perfect
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #14 · "Admirable" blur samples

135 f/2L @ f/2

This image is copyrighted by the owner

@ f/2.5

MP-E 65 f/2.8 @ f/11

Sigma 150 f/2.8 @ f/4

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 05, 2008 at 12:56 PM

brainiac
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #15 · "Admirable" blur samples

Zeiss 35 f1.4 at f2. Most people won't like the octagonal highlights, but it doesn't bother me at all, because the bokeh still manages to be alluring and the lens has a strong 3D feel:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Another example of 35 f1.4 bokeh, probably at f2.8:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 05, 2008 at 01:04 PM

brainiac
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #16 · "Admirable" blur samples

BTW - I see no problem with a few examples of Canon/Nikon bokeh here. One of the reasons for using alt gear is because some of it supposedly does things that Canon/Nikon gear and lenses doesn't. For the sake of objectivity it's important that those lenses are represented here, otherwise this thread will be a less useful resource. How else can we make the comparison?

Here's the 17-40 at 40mm:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Oly 40 f2:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Zeiss N24-85:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Leica 180 f2:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 05, 2008 at 01:14 PM

Jonas B
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #17 · "Admirable" blur samples

Brainiac; I posted some unprocessed Leica images for you in the very first reply at page 1. I think it was in the Siggy50 thread you commented on the Leica bokeh to be too soft, or too little edgy. Do the posted samples make you happier?

Jul 05, 2008 at 01:27 PM

Lotusm50
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #18 · "Admirable" blur samples

This is from the Zeiss N 100mm f2.8 Marko Sonnar. It reverses what you would normally or conventionally choose to have in focus and what you would have out of focus.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Edited on Jul 05, 2008 at 01:35 PM

Jul 05, 2008 at 01:35 PM

brainiac
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #19 · "Admirable" blur samples

Jonas B wrote:
Brainiac; I posted some unprocessed Leica images for you in the very first reply at page 1. I think it was in the Siggy50 thread you commented on the Leica bokeh to be too soft, or too little edgy. Do the posted samples make you happier?

Like I said, thanks a lot, but no. They are very nice, but that's not what I look for in a lens. Lotus's shot above is the look I like. And the other one he showed around the same time on the alt img thread. I think it's more 3D. But like I also said, it really is a matter of taste. Some people can't abide the contrastier 3D look and are much more concerned about rich colour and soft bokeh.

In the case of the bluebell images, it may just be the contrast, or the fact that they are quite small. I would like to see them a bit bigger.

Oly 28 f2:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

More Zeiss 35 f1.4 bokeh:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

200 f1.8:

Edited on Jul 05, 2008 at 02:05 PM

Jul 05, 2008 at 01:47 PM

telyt
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #20 · "Admirable" blur samples

brainiac wrote:
Zeiss 35 f1.4 at f2. Most people won't like the octagonal highlights, but it doesn't bother me at all, because the bokeh still manages to be alluring

It's not that the highlights are octagonal, it's the hard edges they have that distract my attention from the subject. Is the subject of the photo the bokeh? If so the photo is a smashing success because I can't keep my eyes off the background. If the subject of the photo is the person, the photo is not as successful because the hard edges of the octagons keep drawing my eye away from the subject. Same for the Oly 28/2 photos.

Edited on Jul 05, 2008 at 09:27 PM

Jul 05, 2008 at 03:50 PM

brainiac
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #21 · "Admirable" blur samples

telyt wrote:
brainiac wrote:
Zeiss 35 f1.4 at f2. Most people won't like the octagonal highlights, but it doesn't bother me at all, because the bokeh still manages to be alluring

It's not that the highlights are octagonal, it's the hard edges they have that distract my attention from the subject. Is the subject of the photo the bokeh? If so the photo is a smashing success because I can't keep my eyes off the background. If the subject of the photo is the person, the photo is not as successful because the hard edges of the octagons keep drawing my eye away from the subject. Same for the Oly 28/2 photos.

Guess you're not a fan of orchestral music then. The cellos never shut up to let you listen to the violins... ;-)

Actually I agree with you that in the shot of the DJ the Oly emphasizes the edges of the highlights too much. I prefer an evenly illuminated disc with sharp edges. That way it's less distracting but still dances when you want to look at it. That bee shot of wee's is perfect.

I'm not too keen on the Noctilux. It seems to go too far the other way, and over-soften so that the bokeh contains no layers at all. Maybe it's just that those shots don't have any strong highlights in the background.

Edited on Jul 05, 2008 at 10:49 PM

Jul 05, 2008 at 10:41 PM

brainiac
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.3 #22 · "Admirable" blur samples

I guess that's pretty much what it says here:

The whole article: http://bokehtests.com/Site/About_Bokeh.html

Jul 05, 2008 at 10:54 PM

Daniel Goller
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #23 · "Admirable" blur samples

Edited on Jul 06, 2008 at 01:29 AM

Jul 06, 2008 at 01:28 AM

voeboe
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.3 #24 · "Admirable" blur samples

What about these? Is this a good bokeh?

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 06, 2008 at 09:06 AM

Jonas B
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.3 #25 · "Admirable" blur samples

brainiac wrote:
In the case of the bluebell images, it may just be the contrast, or the fact that they are quite small. I would like to see them a bit bigger.

I'm sorry. I missed your earlier reply, I had no intent to nag you. Anyway; contrast and processing are of course changing everything. I took the blubell f/4 image and applied a fairly normal, maybe overdone, routine for web display and then it came out this way:

Blotchy noise and such is down to the small Olympus sensor, the crop is around 60-70% size. Regards,

Jul 06, 2008 at 10:32 AM


FM Forums \| Alternative Gear & Lenses \| Join Image Upload 1 2 3 4 … 93 94 end