Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Hosting

	Moderated by: guardian
	Username   Password Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell FM Forum Rules FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Image Upload end Archive 2008 · sigma vs tamron

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #1 · sigma vs tamron I really need to get a new standard lens, my 35-80 just isnt cutting it, plus its 15 years old so i dont know how much longer it'll hold out for. I would like to get a canon 24-70 2.8L but I couldnt exactly cough up a grand on a lens. I have narrowed my options to the sigma 24-70 2.8 and tamrons equal model ( i cant think of the focal length off the top of my head, but i know its a 2.8 ). Has anyone had any experience with these? If its decent, i could easily fork out around 300-400 for one of these. thanks Jun 28, 2008 at 03:34 AM

dcains Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #2 · sigma vs tamron Concensus here would say get the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, and personal experience would concur. I've also got the 24-70L, and tne Tamron doesn't fall very short in comparison, even on my 5D. Jun 28, 2008 at 03:49 AM

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #3 · sigma vs tamron wow, its that good huh. for a lens that goes for more than half of canons and be as good as you say, thats pretty impressive. Jun 28, 2008 at 03:52 AM

dcains Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #4 · sigma vs tamron Check for other threads in the Canon mount SLR forum. I carry the Tamron much more often, mostly because it's also 1/2 the size and weight. It does give up a bit in color and contrast, the bokeh isn't quite so special, and AF is slower. But, it's a great lens,nonetheless, and offers maybe 90% of what the Canon can. This is my second one, actually, as I sold the first to buy the Canon, but found I missed the Tamron. Jun 28, 2008 at 04:01 AM

nikt Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #5 · sigma vs tamron The bokeh , as Dean mentioned, not spectacular and AF is a bit noise and slow, but the lens is fantastic, super value. Jun 28, 2008 at 10:36 AM

Jman13 Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #6 · sigma vs tamron Since you're on a 30D, the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 may be a better option. It's a better range, and is at least as good as the 28-75. Jun 28, 2008 at 12:03 PM

Pixel Perfect Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #7 · sigma vs tamron The Tamron would be my choice in a heartbeat and it's great on FF too. Jun 28, 2008 at 12:03 PM

monoprint Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #8 · sigma vs tamron Another vote for the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8: Jun 28, 2008 at 02:23 PM

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #9 · sigma vs tamron the tamron seems pretty promising, i do have a question about it. does it have internal focusing? I dont know the exact name of it, but its where the top of the lens stays stationary and you can adjust the focus on a ring at the bottom of the lens. I use a cir polarizing filter and id rather have it stay in place rather than move with the focusing ring. Jun 28, 2008 at 04:00 PM

monoprint Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #10 · sigma vs tamron The barrel of the Tamron moves in and out as you change focal length (fully extended at 75mm) but it does not rotate. Jun 28, 2008 at 04:57 PM

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #11 · sigma vs tamron awesome, if its as good as you guys say it is, sounds like a winner to me. is this lens the asphercial one? theres two 28-75 2.8s on the review section. Jun 29, 2008 at 12:09 AM

monoprint Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #12 · sigma vs tamron John Potts wrote: is this lens the asphercial one? theres two 28-75 2.8s on the review section. Mine is. Jun 29, 2008 at 12:18 AM

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #13 · sigma vs tamron Is there much of a difference between the 2? Jun 29, 2008 at 12:21 AM

dcains Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #14 · sigma vs tamron I don't think there ever were two different lenses - just some confusion because the full name is so ridiculously long. Not to worry. Edited on Jun 29, 2008 at 12:22 AM Jun 29, 2008 at 12:21 AM

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #15 · sigma vs tamron lol thats what i kinda figured, whats the filter size on it? i usually get some stuff for lenses before I buy the lens itself. btw, this has all been a huge help. thanks alot for saving me like $600 extra on the canon 24-70 2.8L the reason i asked about the 2 separate lenses is because on the reviews, theres a tamron 28-75 2.8 XR Di LD aspherical (if), and a tamron 28-75 28 XR Di, (shrug) Edited on Jun 29, 2008 at 12:31 AM Jun 29, 2008 at 12:28 AM

dcains Offline Buy and Sell: On p.1 #16 · sigma vs tamron 67mm is the filter size, but I'm going to advise against using any filters unless adverse or special conditions dictate. Use of a UV in adverse weather may be OK (blowing sand, surf, etc.) for example. A circular polarizer or GND/ND may be another special use, but never just slap on a cheap UV just for "protection". The Tamron comes with a suitable lens hood, which will actually improve image quality. Jun 29, 2008 at 04:29 AM

John Potts Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #17 · sigma vs tamron I mainly shoot cars and circular polarizers help cut the reflections, but i already have a 67mm filter from my 70-200 F4 so it looks like im already in good shape. I might get another down the road that way i dont have to switch them out whenever I use them. Jun 29, 2008 at 02:11 PM

tootalew Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #18 · sigma vs tamron Another awsomew lens often overlooked in this range is the sigma 24-60, just an awsome lens, if you know how to move your feet for that extra 10-15mm. Jun 29, 2008 at 03:16 PM

Talofa Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #19 · sigma vs tamron all of my tamrons in the past have been super loud and super slow. If I had to pick, I'd get Tokina lenses over Sigma and Tamron Edited on Jul 04, 2008 at 03:30 PM Jul 04, 2008 at 03:29 PM

Kevin M Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #20 · sigma vs tamron tootalew wrote: Another awsomew lens often overlooked in this range is the sigma 24-60, just an awsome lens, if you know how to move your feet for that extra 10-15mm. The Sigma 24-60 EX is a good deal smaller and lighter than the 24-70 EX. A bit lacking in contrast wide open but a very impressive performer stopped down a little. AF is fast and 'accurate' (on my copy) not as quiet as USM but not particularly noisy either. For what I paid for it - a real bargain. Jul 04, 2008 at 03:48 PM

ovredal73 Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #21 · sigma vs tamron tootalew wrote: Another awsomew lens often overlooked in this range is the sigma 24-60, just an awsome lens, if you know how to move your feet for that extra 10-15mm. I really liked this lens as well, when I had a crop camera. Very nice compromise between range, weight, quality and size. Edited on Jul 04, 2008 at 04:24 PM Jul 04, 2008 at 04:23 PM

walnutroof Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #22 · sigma vs tamron Tamron 28-75 f2.8 Di Macro Perfect balance for my 5D Check this out.............. http://www.lubowphotography.com/tamron-canon-test.htm Jul 10, 2008 at 02:35 AM

	FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Image Upload end

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password   Lost password?