Andrew Welsh Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #5 · Help me spend $$- 200mm f/2 IS? | |
Nathan Hobbs wrote:
My 200 1.8 was the best decision i EVER made with my photography, it produces more Wows on location but even more importantly on presentation of the final product.
I'd seriously consider swapping for the 200/1.8 if it had IS. Even with the 2/3 stop advantage (due to the differing t-stops of the two lenses, the 200/1.8 transmits more light through at f/2 than the 200/2 does at f/2), it still doesn't make the lens hand-holdable at light that meters as 1/30 sec with the 200/2 (the 200/1.8 would register 1/50 sec, and you'd have to be mighty steady at 200mm with a lens known to not have the best balance for handholding). Although coupled with a 5DII and ISO6400 that could get you up to 1/80 or 1/100... hmm.
The wedding I played with the 200/2 had a ceremony metered at ISO3200, 1/20 sec f/2. Pretty darn dark and the 135L was useless. With the 5D2 and 200/1.8 I could swing ISO6400, f/1.8 to get 1/60 SS.
Perhaps Nathan, you could comment on the success rate of hand-holding the 200/1.8 at 1/60 sec?
|