bob_wfmc Offline Image Upload: On
|
New rumour - June | |
garyvot wrote:
An 'n' model of the 1D3 is a good bet at some point, but not to "fix" the AF.
It's simply been Canon's past practice to do a mid-point revision on certain pro cameras prior to a complete model replacement. This happened in the past with the F-1, EOS-1, and EOS-1D II, and and there is a better than even chance that this will happen again with this model.
Im my opinion, Canon has demonstrated a commitment to fix issues with the existing model. It hasn't happened with the alacrity that some owners wished, but I doubt this is due to "arrogance" or "corporate greed", but simply to the reality that some problems are difficult to track down and solve.
I don't believe Canon secretly wishes to drive us all to Nikon. I do think they need to seriously reconsider their quality assurance and release testing process. And, the marketing department needs to connect with reality and verify engineering statements before making claims about "revolutionary" AF performance. It's a problem not of intent, but of competence.
Finally, a realistic appraisal of what is going on at Canon! Big company = lots of red tape, lots of miscommunication or no communication between departments. Couple that with a difficult design flaw and you have the makings of a huge headache! I think Canon does need to evolve, and perhaps this nightmare with be the activation energy needed for some small changes, but change rarely happens in the absence of major economic hardship and I doubt this issues has hurt them significantly.
|