Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Reviews · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
What are the criteria?
FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Image Upload
end
Go to previous topic Go to next topic
sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #1 · Anhinga


General C and C appreciated.
Also, comments about PS work. This image was "rescued" from under-exposure, inadvertently set by me. Among other things, I struggled to reduce noise, without a noise reduction plug-in.
Feel free to play, repost.
Thx.
Scott G






Edited on Mar 17, 2008 at 06:25 PM


Mar 17, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #2 · Anhinga


Scott,

Is the RAW version available?

Bob



Mar 17, 2008 at 06:49 PM
sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #3 · Anhinga


Yeah, I'll e-mail you. I'd appreciate your help.
Scott

Mar 17, 2008 at 06:59 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #4 · Anhinga


Scott,

Here's a quick hack - CS3,

exposure ~ +2.75 in ACR
NR through NeatImage,
Curves,
TLR Digital Velvia Action
Smart Objects - sharpen & selective blur for BG

'bout out of time for tonight - thought I noticed a color shift when saving to jpg - eyes aren't what the used to be but I think CS3 is a POC for jpg conversions anyway - neever get what I saw (probably my doing)



This image is copyrighted by the owner




regards,

Bob

Mar 18, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Scott Stoness
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #5 · Anhinga


NIce for eyes, background is good. Birds are hard to get because they don't let you get close. So good job.

I think this would be improved with more space to the right for him to look into. Clone some more? And maybe a bit off the top.


Mar 18, 2008 at 01:49 AM
Cathy Yount
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #6 · Anhinga


I don't know...I kind of like the original PP better. The other is a little too orange for me, but I DO like the difference in contrast that the edit made. Seems noise reduction was more successful in the first version. Great capture!

Edited on Mar 18, 2008 at 03:33 PM


Mar 18, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #7 · Anhinga


Yes, the edit is perhaps a bit hot - probably a result of the Velvia action. And on this monitor, which is a poor basis for judgment, there is way too much orange.

Bob


Mar 18, 2008 at 04:14 PM
sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #8 · Anhinga


Bob,
Thank for the time and effort. I love the sharpness, and think I need to bump it on my image. I dont have CS2 or 3, so I'll work more with CS and LR. A bit brigther than mine; I think I prefer yours. Colors are, however, off a bit. Did you convert to sRGB?
Curious what others think of the variations, and maybe some other re-works as well....
Scott G

Mar 18, 2008 at 06:34 PM
sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #9 · Anhinga


Cathy,
thanks.
I worked hard on the noise reduction, selection background, applying gaussian blur, healing a bit of the color variation. It's weird, and maybe others know more about this: On high ISO or heavily "recovered" issues, there are vertical bands of noise. It reminds me of the old Etch-a-Sketch drawing tool. If anyone recalls it. Once you cover the enter surface with etching, you see thru to the workings below. Its as if the sensor defects show directly.



Mar 18, 2008 at 06:37 PM
srapson
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #10 · Anhinga


I agree with those above, the color and noise reduction in your original are preferable.

The blur that you ran is near enough to an OOF blur that I would have just assumed a long lens if you hadn't said anything.

That said I do like the sharpness of Bob's version, the texture it brings to the neck is especially nice.

Mar 18, 2008 at 09:39 PM
sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #11 · Anhinga


Thanks, srapson. Actually it was taken with a long lens; 100-400IS @f 4.5 with trees far in the background. The original does look blurred. I attempted to reduce noise further by adding additional blur to the background, smoothing out some uneven-ness in the color (specks of red, esp).

Mar 19, 2008 at 12:39 AM
Bob Jarman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #12 · Anhinga


Scott,

I promised to have another go at it - maybe i got the colors right this time? Thanks for letting me work with it.



This image is copyrighted by the owner




regards,

Bob

Edited on Mar 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM


Mar 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM
ALAN ROYCE
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #13 · Anhinga


Nice image, Scott. I'm liking the softness of the feathers in your post - some sharpening could me made, but don't lose that softness (IMHO, of course) Composition wise, I find that the forground, bright, colored feathers compete with the eye for my attention. The eye, along with the beak and head, wins, but I still feel the pull of the feathers. Since I settled on the eye, and head, the portrait crop now competes with that. Here's a landscape crop - without the pull of the feathers.

Alan






Edited on Mar 19, 2008 at 03:01 AM


Mar 19, 2008 at 02:51 AM
sbeme
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #14 · Anhinga


Bob, Alan,
Thanks for lending your eyes and talents to the image. Color is more accurate in these re-works.
I'm curious what others think about the landscape crop.
Scott G

Mar 19, 2008 at 06:34 PM
Alan321
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #15 · Anhinga


Scott, you need to get a NR program such as Neat Image Pro.

Bob, I take it that you worked with the raw image. It looks to me like there is still too much noise in it. Neat Image Pro should be able to remove more of the very low frequency blotchiness than you achieved, but you need to tick the appropriate box as an option.

I like the landscape image because the bottom part of the original was not sharp enough compared to the rest. However, I do not like the high contrast look (perhaps too much sharpening on the fine details) as it seems rather unnatural. At first the appearance of the bird's neck looked a bit odd but it was that way in the original too.

- Alan

Mar 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #16 · Anhinga


Alan,

I use NI Pro but am not familiar enough with it to really fine tune it. Yes, Scott provided the RAW file, I stayed with CS3 although although I'd really like to work on it with Capture NX but that doesn't seem to want to read Canon files

regards,

Bob

Edited on Mar 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM


Mar 25, 2008 at 11:25 PM

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Image Upload
end
  Go to previous topic Go to next topic

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost password?