christo™ Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #5 · Possible CMOS flaw of 1D2N? | |
That is interesting. It sure isn't blooming or moire in any definitions of which I'm aware. If that's a reflection issue, it's darn interesting one that causes a negative. I believe it's a post capture, in camera, processing issue. The one post on analog compensator circuitry going wonkers is interesting, but if that were the case I would not expect the spatial displacement of the shadows, and I would expect less consistency with the varied backgrounds. A compensator saturating doesn't act like that. My best guess is a digital filter "flaw" in the sensor readout.
My question is, as it is hard to tell from these low res screen shots, and all these mysterious shadows seem to be in details near the limit of the 35mm format, do these "defects" really stand out in large prints? I know that once you see them, you see them quickly, and it is not nice to see digital artifacts in your photos, but does anyone buying the pictures actually care? Are you seeing this, for instance affecting a main subject athlete in a brightly front lit shiny white uniform shot against a dark background?
It would be really interesting to know if the same model bodies that don't exhibit the effect have different firmware. (I.E.: is it caused by hard circuitry in the Digic, or is it due to parameters loaded into it by the firmware?)
|