jsdill wrote:
Oh, nick furnari...it is folks like you that lend substance to this forum.
...Jordan
Thank you, Jordan, for finally acknowledging that there is some merit to my humor and that more than one person found it entertaining. I, too, was happy to read Nick's support of my subtle humor.
If we can laugh at ourselves occasionally, we keep a more positive outlook...
gheller wrote:
My point was a humor break...seems you and Osai need to go out and have a drinky-poo together.
I would not have even responded to Osai (or you, for that matter) had you not been rude.
Others enjoyed my play on words...seems to be lost on you two.
Check out 99.9% of my posts. It will become abundantly clear that your statement is without merit.
gee whiz...the PI & DA page sure is touchy...
greg
I too have experienced some rudeness from jsdill a while back.
I enjoyed the play on words Greg
This play on words clearly illustrates an enormous lack of understanding.
Taking that into consideration, I no longer find the image to be rude... only callow.
jsdill wrote:
Oh, nick furnari...it is folks like you that lend substance to this forum.
Jordan, it seems your subtle wisp of satire has been lost here.
You said: "Ok, so less than a few on PI & DA have a sense of humor, I can accept that, but what does "Court of Leaves" mean...Why is the title of every one of this person's posts..."
For the record, to answer your question is the only reason I entered this tiresome thread.
Had you regularly followed what is posted in this forum you would not have had to ask that (assuming you were serious) - but of course that is only an opinion.
I really am not interested in who thinks what is funny. Nor is any personal theory tied to my lack of interest.
I finally figured out why some people didn't "get" it. Here is the explanation - The posted image is of a "tennis" court with "leaves" on it! See, it IS funny when you know what to look for! Obviously if you thought it was "trash" on the "ground", you would not have gotten the joke.
I took the attached photo recently while awaiting my hearing for some aperture-related crimes. I think it might clear up a lot of misunderstanding about this whole issue.
I'm sorry Jordan, can't let this one die just yet. Cuz I gotta toss in my two cents and confirm that no, that pic was not funny. More like an incredibly lame attempt at being funny and failing completely.
Now Greg, if you had posted what Davis did and made a good-natured apology to Jordan saying you hope he doesn't mind, probably everyone including Jordan would've had a good laugh and agreed it was funny. But instead you basically posted a bad photo of a fence, showing very little of a tennis court and even fewer leaves and thought that everyone should "get it". Worse yet, you attack Jordan without provocation, and proclaim yourself to be humorous while the rest of us on the PI&DA board are without it. Again, I'm failing to see the humor in that.
to each their own, "IronBear", but I recommend you re-read (or read for the first time) the entire thread...you will see that (most of) your comments are without merit.
I was surprised at the PMs I have received thanking me for this thread. I guess people were getting tired of the usual "court of leaves" and were pleasantly surprised with my "humorous" take on it.
BTW, I have nothing bad to say to Jordan, I think even he will state that based on our mutual respect.
IronBear wrote:
I'm sorry Jordan, can't let this one die just yet. Cuz I gotta toss in my two cents and confirm that no, that pic was not funny. More like an incredibly lame attempt at being funny and failing completely.
Now Greg, if you had posted what Davis did and made a good-natured apology to Jordan saying you hope he doesn't mind, probably everyone including Jordan would've had a good laugh and agreed it was funny. But instead you basically posted a bad photo of a fence, showing very little of a tennis court and even fewer leaves and thought that everyone should "get it". Worse yet, you attack Jordan without provocation, and proclaim yourself to be humorous while the rest of us on the PI&DA board are without it. Again, I'm failing to see the humor in that. ...Show more →
What a surprise...Osai agrees with the anti-Greg sentiment - didn't see that coming
how many times do I have to say that the PI & DA board needs an infusion of TIC humor
Anyway, thanks to IronBear and Osai for the bump. I was gonna let it move silently to the 2nd page (if that ever happens on this board), but thanks to you 2, it may go on living...
gheller wrote:
What a surprise...Osai agrees with the anti-Greg sentiment - didn't see that coming
how many times do I have to say that the PI & DA board needs an infusion of TIC humor
Anyway, thanks to IronBear and Osai for the bump. I was gonna let it move silently to the 2nd page (if that ever happens on this board), but thanks to you 2, it may go on living...
greg
I'd hazard a guess that you are a contrarian.
If you're tired of the thread why not just delete it?
other people agree with you? oh well I must've been wrong all along if random interweb people disagree with me. what was i thinking?
I know you don't see it and never will, but take it from those of us who aren't lame, your sense of humor is kinda like listening to Bob Saget's jokes from reruns of "Full House". And I have no doubt there's people that enjoy that cheesy sense of humor, but it's not mine and it's definitely not a whoooole lot of other people's. The difference between us is, I don't insist that you guys in the Full House crowd see things my way. If you think a fence is funny, good for you. But don't get your panties all in a bunch when other people don't - especially the guy you're making fun of.
Greg
