brainiac Offline Image Upload: On
|
>What it's boiling down to is, let's find more ways to trash this camera because it's the cool thing to do these days.
I explained at the beginning of the post that I sent a message to Canon asking for changes when I first started using a 5D, and that some of those changes have appeared. As many have said on this thread, the 1D3 is a great camera, maybe the greatest so far, but that doesn't make it flawless, and compiling a list of things we would like Canon to fix in a future camera, and sending it to Canon, is a good way of getting that better future camera.
>I wonder what would happen if someone decided to do a "post your AF issues" on other Canon or Nikon cameras...
This thread is about desired fixes to the 1D3 other than the heavily discussed AF problem. Why not start your own thread if you want to talk about other cameras.
>...or "post anything that you are bothered by with this or that particular camera" strings just because it's cool, even though it solves nothing because arguments and opinions seem to hit the 50/50 mark on everything, even the Mark III "polls".
There is some consensus on this thread about some of the camera's annoyances. That means that when I send my list to Canon, I can back it up with views of other users. Needless to say, I won't include yours.
>If I can recall, 50/50 means a coin toss, pure chance, and nothing scientific included or underlined.
50% of users reporting a particular problem isn't a coin toss, it's very strong evidence that a problem exists. Tossing coins is no less scientific than the Schrodinger equation.
>It's humorous to say the least, but it's beginning to get old, worn out, and other nasty little terms.
Sorry not to be an earlier adopter. Why don't you go and hang out on the '1D3 successes' thread and leave the nasty business to us.
Edited on Oct 04, 2007 at 12:13 PM
|