Paul Schmidt Offline Image Upload: Off
|
'Official' Post-PMA Discussion thread | |
JohnnyGCanon wrote:
Hammerli wrote:
Chris Dees wrote:
Since the D60, and you still stay with this ancient, old fashion, not innovative company?
Exactly my thoughts, all these people complaining how antiquated their 30Ds are, but I see they are all still here in the Canon forum after they tell us how Nikon is offering them so much more. I don't look forward to 6 more months of this endless bashing and speculation; I wish they'd shut-up or put-up and buy into the Nikon system if they think it is superior.
I'm still complaining and will continue until I'm satisfied that Canon CAN bring out an updated 20D. They pretended they did with the 30D but it was just a warmed-over 20D.
So, I'm not going to shut up and I'm not going to buy into the Nikon system. Maybe some of you that are complaining about other Canon users should. I've been a Canon user for over 30 years and probably will continue no matter who tells me to quit!

Well, there are a couple of real issues, for the 40D. It needs to sit between the 400D and the 5D, without affecting either, which means that price wise, it needs to come in around where the 30D is.
One thing that people here, tend to forget, is that a new design from the ground up, is very expensive to do, it's much cheaper to take a starting point, since it replaces the 30D, the sensible starting point, is a 30D, drop in the sensor from either the 400D or the 1DMkIII, update the processor to the Digic III, and monkey with the firmware. Maybe they can add a few new features, like some weather sealing, and mirror lockup, a few extra AF points, but it's not going to be everything brand new. Which means post introduction, people will say it's a warmed over 30D, which is a warmed over 20D, ad nausium.
What I find interesting with all this, film camera models, tended to last a long time, some lasted for 5-10 years, People didn't clamour for a new model every 3 months then, but basic designs didn't change much either.
|