fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
  

Archive 2006 · ABR800 Ringflash

  
 
Ed Peters
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · ABR800 Ringflash


Some interesting observations from Rolando over at G1 : http://www.glamour1.com/forums/main-community-forum/31067-dont-smack-bee.html
About AB's in general and ABR specifically. I'd love to see a discussion on some
of the points that Rolando makes by Paul Buff..



Nov 26, 2006 at 11:20 AM
stiksandstones
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · ABR800 Ringflash


Rolando is just another guy, not a photo god by any stretch of the imagination...take his words with a grain of salt.


Nov 26, 2006 at 11:34 AM
Paul Buff
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · ABR800 Ringflash


Ed Peters wrote:
Some interesting observations from Rolando over at G1 : http://www.glamour1.com/forums/main-community-forum/31067-dont-smack-bee.html
About AB's in general and ABR specifically. I'd love to see a discussion on some
of the points that Rolando makes by Paul Buff..


I have taken the liberty of pasting some of Rolando's comments in question and will address them as requested

Rolando:
"Since you brought them up, their history has indicated they've been the only (that I'm aware of) photographic lighting company that used (for marketing and sales) the term "effective" watt-seconds".

Buff:
Not correct. The term was first used for good reason by a company name Inverse Square Systems in their Stoblox. It was also implied by Bowens ("B800") and by Photogenics ("DR1250, etc"). Buff products are specified more completely than any I am aware of.

Rolando:
Not only that, they claim one-tenth F/stop accuracy (as marketed at the price without any adapters) yet their adjustment "slider" is just that, a sliding mechanism that rely's on "human touch." No clicks, no actual visual (accurate verification), nada but your human judgement and feel. If you're that accurate with your human touch, you're in the wrong business and should be a surgeon."

Buff:
That's an insult to 90% of photographers. Photography, for most, is not brain surgery - it is indeed human touch - an artistic, subjective endeavor. Our sliders are very accurate and allow real people to easily adjust light balance within 2/10f and don't require calculators or a PHD in electronics.. Only brain surgeons and esoterics need more than that. Absolute exposure control is a different matter - moderns do this in RAW.

Rolando:
"It has at least 1/3 or 1/4 of the power of a pro ring-flash. Now, if you understand the purpose of a ring-flash, you will realize that power is important in many situations--for a ring-flash! Stand 8-feet in front of your AB ring and have someone fire off five pops--you'll see nothing but white-shaped donuts after the first pop."

Buff:
300WS at 8' has the same effect on a model as 1200WS at 16'

Rolando:
"Now I mention 8-feet based on their own data about their power and in order to achieve the right F/stop--and that's indoors. The sunny-sixteen rule will tell you you will not "overpower the sun with flash" outdoors with their ringflash unless you're 5-feet or less from your subject!. I use my ring-flash indoors and outdoors, especially during the first part of a sunset I need the power and the distance that power gives me, especially with a light modifier in front of that ring! We're talking at least 1,200 to 1,500 watt-seconds--realy watt-seconds not "implied."

Buff:
The ABR800 is not marketed as capable of turning daylight to dark. It is called a "Studio Flash" Still, its f22 @ 7 feet can come close. This is one of many uses. For dark daylight, the upcoming Zeus produces 2500 real WS at a fraction of the cost of others. There are apples and there are oranges"

Rolando:
Speaking of, AB claims they are coming out with some light modifiers including a "moon box" or something--any light modifier that has a diffusion panel of some sort will reduce your power output even more!"

Buff:
The Moon Unit (now available) solves the problem of tiny catchlights and the often undesirable "signature ring look". To accomplish this involves moving the light close enough to the subject to get some wrap around and pleasing catchlights. f16 to f32 exposures are easy with the ABR/Moon Unit for these purposes.

Rolando:
"I'm just not thrilled about their ring-flash unit because it's very low powered (1/3) than what a pro would use in normal situations and especially in difficult situations. They are obviously not targeting pros"

Buff:
We target 90% of the shooters, not the esoterics. If ABR800 is 1/3 what a "pro" would use, then the Zeus is twice what a "pro" would use - guess we should call it Ultra Pro?

Rolando:
"What everyone is failing to see is that a ring-flash is not only faddish at times, but it's limited in use, even the pro versions, it's a specific "tool" not a light that will make everyone shoot like a top NYC fashion photog. While sure the AB unit will put out light and a few will get some shots in the studio with it, it's not going to get you the Pulitzer much less the cover of Vogue."

Buff:
Again, insulting to most shooters. NYC is not the world and Vogue and Pulitzers are not judged on equipment, but on talent and results. The ABR800 is more useful to most than the limited capabilities of most more expensive ringflash units.

Rolando:
"Now to clarify, yes, I'm sponsored. (all images shot with a professional Hensel RingFlash)"

Buff:
Obviously. I too am sponsored - by my customers - the vast mainstream of pro and amateur photographers in America.

Best regards,

Paul Buff



Nov 26, 2006 at 02:06 PM
jtsmith
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · ABR800 Ringflash


Paul

Thanks for putting out such a fine product. Images shot recently (a week ago) at my Supershoots.com event in Tampa Florida during an on location instructional class using a vagabond and the ABR800. I have not purchased mine yet but after a registered photographer showed up to our Las Vegas Supershoot to show it off and in Tampa another photographer brought his system and when I was asked if I wanted to play and teach with it, well, let's just say my mother didn't raise a fool.

It's Simple, effective and wonderful to use.

We work with, promote, recommend and continue to back your products.

P.S. Folks, This message is unsolicited as I am sponsored by no one.

http://www.supershoots.com/smith/3860a.jpg

http://www.supershoots.com/smith/3811a.jpg

http://www.supershoots.com



Nov 28, 2006 at 02:19 AM
rcooper
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · ABR800 Ringflash


J T, can you post the F stop, Shutter Speed, time of Day, and power setting on that last shot? I still haven't had a chance to shoot my ABR outdoors, but I'm wondering if I might need to exchange it for one of the Zeus models.

Thanks



Nov 28, 2006 at 05:30 AM
Ed Peters
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · ABR800 Ringflash


For those of you not able to reach the G1 board, the following is the reply to Paul's
comments from Rolando:

Ok, to make it easier on the eyes and minds, I've only added numbers for reference purposes and to make it easier for the readers.

Quote #1--OK, I stand corrected, but we all know that "effective" watt seconds is just marketing hype and hyperbole. Nothing against free enterprise, my hat off to Mr. Buff.

Quote #2--90% of the photographers? C'mon Mr. Buff, we all know 85% of the statistics are made up? Did you really do a survey? Photographers don't physically touch, at least not models, they mentally judge, they first learn to see the light then feel the light--every pro knows that. When exact color, lighting output and light temperature is needed, there is a world of difference between light based on human touch and lights with digital readouts with decimal points that reference light meters. Even at 2/10th's of an F/stop you've got some super sensitive hands. Again, as an analogy I ask you to get your water temperature in your shower within 2/10th's of a degree accuracy, better yet, within a 5-degree accuracy without some sort of visual verification. Accuracy is important more in digital photography today than the large latitude of color negative film--don't believe me, blow out a digital image verses a negative film image. I rest my case.

Quote #3--Obviously you know the inverse square law, but models don't. Again, try flashing more than once a ring-flash at a model 8-feet away from her verses 16-feet, a helluva of a difference. Better yet, you stand in front of your ringflash for at least 10 pops in two minutes at 8-feet and full power and see if you don't get nauseated? I'm no model, but I can gurantee you if we impaneled a focus group of models and placed them 8-feet then 16-feet they would not like being close to a ring flash. This has to do with the "face" of the model, the most important part of the image. Be real!

Quote #4--See Quote #3 first then anwser, how much does the Zuess cost?

Quote #5--With the $400 ring, how close (your words, close, please explain what is "pleasing" at that F/stop 16 to 32 that you claim) to get F/22 as you state with the Moon adapter?

Quote #6--You are publicly calling pros "esoterics," please explain that to those that don't know the definition. I have no hidden doctrine nor do most pros. We all start from the bottom, even I started with a Smith Victor hot light kit.

Quote #7--- Very ambiguous answer. First, you knock pros and then you say they are judged on talent and results. I agree on the latter, but how different are pro ring-flash units than yours? What I mean, you state they are limited? Explain.

Quote #8--Your customers pay your bills, nothing wrong with that, but they are not sponsors, they are you beta testers.

Now I just supplied a rebuttel as I'm having fun playing Devil's Advocate while I hope I don't get a letter from Mr. Buff's attorney to cease and desist my opinions. Which would be totally uncalled for, but I understand business.

Let's get something straight, I have nothing against Mr. Buff and have heard great things about him. I wish him well and I publicly ask him to let me try his products and give my honest opinion--win me over as they say. I've been shooting for 27 years and as I've said before, I've used them all--from Novatrons to Pro Photo, even at one time WL's. Make a believer out of me if you belive in your products that much--I'm open for ideas. I will personally work with you, Mr. Buff, by your side. C'mon, I just photographed a New York Times best selling author for one of the top publishing houses in the world, with a $700 camera, so using a $700 light won't bother me. Seriously, I challenge Mr. Buff to a shoot with his products with him there, let's do this right, unbiased, and as professionals.

With that said, my original point was be careful what you spend money on, don't get caught up in the marketing hype and make un-nformed decisions, don't purchase on impulse. Buy the right tool for what you need, not what you want.

I will say, I've heard great things about Mr. Buff and his company and with his money back guarantee for a full 100% satisfaction, how can you go wrong? Buy his products, if it works for you, more power to you, if it doesn't, ask for you money back. I wish him, WL, AB and his fans all the luck, I also hope to have a drink with him someday--seriously, printed words often sound harsher than spoken words and Mr. Buff sounds like a cool guy. For the record, I did approach WL/Buff years ago after I started GG and never received a response as I felt a majority of our folks here could use their products--still feel that way today. Wishing all the best, rg sends!



Nov 28, 2006 at 09:35 AM
jtsmith
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · ABR800 Ringflash


rcooper wrote:
J T, can you post the F stop, Shutter Speed, time of Day, and power setting on that last shot? I still haven't had a chance to shoot my ABR outdoors, but I'm wondering if I might need to exchange it for one of the Zeus models.

Thanks


I don't know the power setting. I know it was not at full power.

the first shot is 90th at f-8 taken at darkened dusk.

the second shot is 125th at f-11 at sunset. If I remember correctly sun was still up slightly but underneath a small layer of thin clouds just off camera.

I don't even remember how far away the ring flash was. Perhaps 10 feet and I know it was not at full power because I had asked to cut the ring flash down from already asking to turn the ring flash down in set up.

J T




Nov 28, 2006 at 09:36 AM
Steve Beck
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · ABR800 Ringflash


I hate to see bittering like this. I commend Paul for his ingenuity and what seems to be a great series of products. The great thing for me is he is making products that seem to produce great results and a very affortable price. I do not own any of his products yet but have been reading and posting questions all over the net and am about to make a large pruchase from him. Well large for me 2-2.5k worth of lighting to start a in home studio and some location stuff. Without his package pricing and product quality I would not be able to do what i want to do from another company.


Nov 28, 2006 at 10:38 AM
Quack
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · ABR800 Ringflash


jtsmith wrote:
I don't know the power setting. I know it was not at full power.

the first shot is 90th at f-8 taken at darkened dusk.

the second shot is 125th at f-11 at sunset. If I remember correctly sun was still up slightly but underneath a small layer of thin clouds just off camera.



great pics

was the ABR800 the only light?

looking at the EXIF here are the times:
the 1st pic was 2006-11-19 16:52:34
the 2nd was 2006-11-19 16:23:24



Nov 28, 2006 at 12:08 PM
jtsmith
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · ABR800 Ringflash


Quack wrote:
great pics

was the ABR800 the only light?

looking at the EXIF here are the times:
the 1st pic was 2006-11-19 16:52:34
the 2nd was 2006-11-19 16:23:24


The first one no. I triggered a hand held Metz for hair/rim with a pocket wizard at the same time I triggered the ABR800

The second one is just the ABR800

J T



Nov 28, 2006 at 01:19 PM
Paul Buff
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · ABR800 Ringflash


Ed Peters wrote:
Even at 2/10th's of an F/stop you've got some super sensitive hands. Again, as an analogy I ask you to get your water temperature in your shower within 2/10th's of a degree accuracy, better yet, within a 5-degree accuracy without some sort of visual verification.

Quote #4--See Quote #3 first then anwser, how much does the Zuess cost?

Quote #5--With the $400 ring, how close (your words, close, please explain what is "pleasing" at that F/stop 16 to 32 that you claim) to get F/22 as you state with the Moon adapter?

Quote #6--You are publicly calling pros "esoterics," please explain that
...Show more

It doesn't take sensitive hands to set our sliders to 2/10f. If you can spot out pimples in PS you can set the dial.Just read the dial. The verification is little different than digital readout - what the dial says is what you get. On digital, the readout makes you feel like it is absolutely accurate while, in fact, it may or may not be - it's a matter of the accuracy of design. When I take a shower I don't care about 2/10° - if it feels good it's OK. Just because a digital scale or water temp readout says "121.5 lbs" or 101.6742°F" doesn't make it true - it's just a readout.

The Zeus RingMaster will be $299. That's with 2500WS tubes, 300 watts worth of modeling (4500 Lumens), very fast flash duration, two cooling fans for 20,000WS/minute, about 1 1/2 lbs. The 1250WS (real) Zeus power pack is $599. Two flash outlets, 1.2 second recycle, assymetrical distribution plus five f stop variable flash and model power, big internal fan for heavy use, very compact case with lid and handle. The 2500WS pack is $799 with same features and 2.4 second recycle. We could make it cycle faster but don't like blown house fuses.

"Pleasing" is up to the shooter. If you want big catchlights you want to be about 4-6'. This equates to about 1.5' for straight ringflash. At 10' the ABR800 with Moon Unit yields about f8 + 7/10 (ISO100). The ABR800 without Moon Unit yields f16 at 10' Add 3 f stops to this for Zeus RingMaster at 2500WS. Also, Moon Unit eliminates red eye, and modeling lamps usually do also.

I do not call pros "esoterics". I reserve the term for, well, esoterics. Most pros are not esoterics - they are pragmatic and knowledgable photographers - they have to be to remain pros (meaning they make money at what they do.)

"Pro" ringflashes are limited by excess weight, lack of modeling lamps, lack of long-term rapid shooting capabilitiy (no fans), lack of accessories as useful as the Moon Unit, too much heat around the lens if used heavily, etc. Suddenly, the "pro" manufacturers are realizing some of this and putting in fans and modeling lamps. For $600 you can buy an umbrella for one of them, but it's not an aim-through softbox with masks.

I don't do attorney letters for such trivial things as public discussion - not to worry. None of this offends me - it's good for everyone to discuss things.

Paul Buff



Nov 28, 2006 at 02:42 PM
Paul Buff
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · ABR800 Ringflash


Quack wrote:
great pics

was the ABR800 the only light?

For what it's worth, I see shadows here that say this is not all straight ringflash.

Paul Buff

looking at the EXIF here are the times:
the 1st pic was 2006-11-19 16:52:34
the 2nd was 2006-11-19 16:23:24




Nov 28, 2006 at 02:44 PM
jtsmith
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · ABR800 Ringflash


Paul Buff wrote:
For what it's worth, I see shadows here that say this is not all straight ringflash.

Paul Buff


Perhaps the ring flash bounced off my head in whatever you are seeing.

I don't know outside of what I already explained in the two images in this thread and another. The african american model was the ring flash solo. The model in swimsuit was your ring flash and a metz used for hair/rim.

J T



Nov 28, 2006 at 02:57 PM
Paul Buff
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · ABR800 Ringflash


jtsmith wrote:
Perhaps the ring flash bounced off my head in whatever you are seeing.

I don't know outside of what I already explained in the two images in this thread and another. The african american model was the ring flash solo. The model in swimsuit was your ring flash and a metz used for hair/rim.

J T


I'm not trying to be picky - just analytical. The strong shadows under the chins and from the arms indicate if it was only ringflash the flash was off the camera - above and to the camera right. This is certainly OK to do.

Regards,

Paul Buff



Nov 28, 2006 at 06:57 PM
jtsmith
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · ABR800 Ringflash


Paul Buff wrote:
I'm not trying to be picky - just analytical. The strong shadows under the chins and from the arms indicate if it was only ringflash the flash was off the camera - above and to the camera right. This is certainly OK to do.

Regards,

Paul Buff


Paul,

We had it on a stand off camera.

J T



Nov 28, 2006 at 06:59 PM
Paul Buff
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · ABR800 Ringflash


jtsmith wrote:
Paul,

We had it on a stand off camera.

J T

Thanks for the clarification. Your shots are great and ought to dispel assertions that ABR800 isn't powerful enough for this sort of shooting outdoors.

Thanx

Paul Buff



Nov 28, 2006 at 11:21 PM
djklmnop
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · ABR800 Ringflash


Don't worry about it, Paul. Based on his responses my immediate reaction was.. "Holy crap, the more this guy writes, the more he is showing his own ignorance."

I have a better idea. Sponsor me! Ship me an ABR800, a Vegabond, and a few honeycomb grids and I'll show him! Not to mention, his photos are way over-photoshopped. To the trained eye, his work shows NO lighting skill. Just standard lighting with a lot of post processing.

Andy

OOOH LOOK, shot with Alien Bees!

http://www.vermillionstudios.com/temp/coverbaby.jpg




Nov 30, 2006 at 01:54 AM
john Paul
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · ABR800 Ringflash




We don't need no stinkin Rolando..

;-)

JP



Nov 30, 2006 at 12:12 PM
Brent Ward
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · ABR800 Ringflash


I guess my eye isn't trained enough, his shots seem fine to me.

I totally understand what he's talking about in regards to the products and marketing as well.

But you get what you pay for and Paul's products fall in line with the industries good, better, best pricing scheme.



Nov 30, 2006 at 12:14 PM
Vince Callaway
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · ABR800 Ringflash


I don't think attacking his work is a good way to make a point.

I would not mind checking one out, but I'm not sure how well it would work with an RB67. A big honkin' kens has to fit down the throat of that thing. Plus the way the RB focuses is a little different than most cameras. Handling might be a bit awkward.

I've owned and used lots of brands of lights. My personal setup consists of 4 white lighting ultras and 2 alien bees. In my opinion these lights are the best bang for the buck. At least they are not based on 30 yr old technology like the Novatrons I can't seem to get rid of.



Nov 30, 2006 at 01:24 PM
       2       3       end




FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account