Say It's Not So...

Moderated by: guardian

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload

end

Archive 2003 · Say It's Not So...

smaug
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.2 #1 · Say It's Not So...

DavidP wrote:
smaug wrote:
If it does happen, the 70-200 F4L will need more elements in more groups so by definition it cannot be as sharp as the original.

A common fallacy. More elements does not necessarily imply less sharpness.

More glass equals more barriers to the light traveling through. The highest quality UV filter on the market degrades image quality to some slight degree and that's just adding one more piece of glass... a thin one at that. It's not fallacy, it's physics. Now consider adding 5 or 6 more lenses for the IS group... I don't see how the optics would improve.

Of course if the entire lens is re-worked and higher grade glass is used throughout (maybe flourite or...) then maybe it wouldn't be hampered.
THAT is the real question. Will they use the same glass and just add elements for the IS or re-work the whole she-bang?

Of course you can just write this off as my opinion an prompty forget it if you wish. I'm not trying to start a flame war. I'm just defending my cherished fallacy.

-Steve

Sep 23, 2003 at 03:28 AM

DavidP
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.2 #2 · Say It's Not So...

smaug wrote:
Of course if the entire lens is re-worked and higher grade glass is used throughout (maybe flourite or...) then maybe it wouldn't be hampered.
THAT is the real question. Will they use the same glass and just add elements for the IS or re-work the whole she-bang?

The entire lens has been redesigned in the past, when going to IS.

It's not like they took the same lens design and used it again, slapping some IS elements in there.

So, it doesn't have to follow that the IS lens is less sharp.

Sep 23, 2003 at 03:52 AM

smaug
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.2 #3 · Say It's Not So...

DavidP wrote:

The entire lens has been redesigned in the past, when going to IS.

It's not like they took the same lens design and used it again, slapping some IS elements in there.

So, it doesn't have to follow that the IS lens is less sharp.

Oh, sure. Spoil my fun.

I just might have to upgrade if they do make an IS version. While I truly love my lens as it is, the IS would be quite handy in a lot of situations.

(crossing fingers)

-Steve

Sep 23, 2003 at 04:38 AM

DavidP
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.2 #4 · Say It's Not So...

I know one thing: whatever degradation in sharpness there is from the extra elements is FAR less than the increase in sharpness due to the IS, at least for me.

Sep 23, 2003 at 04:53 AM


FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Image Upload 1 2 end