Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Reviews · Hosting

Moderated by: guardian
Username   Password

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews
FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload
1 2 3 43
44
45 83 84 end
Go to previous topic Go to next topic
Philippe Arnez
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #1 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


dcmiller wrote:
I pity the poor junior marketing person at Canon that reads our rambling. After a year of two they are off to the monastery or insane asylum. "Where's Bob?" "Well... he was assigned to read the Canon forums" "Oh, I'm so sorry. Are you sending flowers?"



Well, I would like that job! Pretty much what I'm doing right now, only I would be earning money for it...
hm, now that I think of it, where do I sign?



Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 30, 2006 at 10:45 PM
ICQ
EA6B
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #2 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Wasn't the 35 .85L due out this year?

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 30, 2006 at 10:48 PM
kleinssz69
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #3 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


It seems as if some guys/gals think that canon releases camera / lenses in response to whatever the competetors are releasing. Think about it, how long does it take for a company to put a new product into production?

I just chuckle when I read some of the post. Don' you think that work on the 400D and whatever else canon will release has begun at a minumum, a year ago? How can the 400D then be a response to what nikon or sony released a month ago? No doubt, canon has already begun work on Digic 4 even though digic 3 isn't in our hands yet.

I've been deeply involved in design and production (mind you, not in tech products), and the ideas and minds behind the products we were working on were years ahead of what the consumer asks for or suspected.

If a company like canon wouldn't be a few steps (years even) ahead of the consumers, they would have long been surpassed by the competition.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 12:10 AM
stevesanacore
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #4 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


I purchased the 5D within a week of it's availability and have been using it ever since, with my 1Ds as a back up. But neither is a substitute for 20+ MP and better AF.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 12:39 AM
jwil
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #5 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


kleinssz69 wrote:
It seems as if some guys/gals think that canon releases camera / lenses in response to whatever the competetors are releasing. Think about it, how long does it take for a company to put a new product into production?

I just chuckle when I read some of the post. Don' you think that work on the 400D and whatever else canon will release has begun at a minumum, a year ago? How can the 400D then be a response to what nikon or sony released a month ago? No doubt, canon has already begun work on Digic 4 even though digic 3 isn't in our hands yet.

I've been deeply involved in design and production (mind you, not in tech products), and the ideas and minds behind the products we were working on were years ahead of what the consumer asks for or suspected.

If a company like canon wouldn't be a few steps (years even) ahead of the consumers, they would have long been surpassed by the competition.


Manufacturers very often release product in response to the competition, the but the trick is that it has been in development for a quite some time. The average person has never been exposed to how future product marketing and planning work in a large company, so this doesn't seem that logical.

Most large companies divide marketing and planning functions among several strategic groups, including Future Product Planning which is tied to R&D, Market Research tied to consumer trend research (think major market shifts like the popularity evolution of the SUV), Competetive Intelligence (industrial espionage), and Current Product Marketing which is closely tied to sales.

The basic function of these groups is that CI and MR feed trends and competetive intel (often down to the competitions specific product roadmaps out to 3-5 years) to R&D and Future PM. That starts the product development cycle usually about the time a product in that space is launched.

So, for example: Canon just launched the Rebel XTi, so right about now, Canon competetive intelligence is putting together a strategy to get next to Nikon, Sony and probably Olympus and Pentax people at Photokina to drill for reaction to the camera. This happens off the show floor. I'm not talking about pumping some booth bunny for info that's 8 levels above her pay grade.

Then over the next 4-6 months CI and MR will be researching the moves of competetors. Does Sony throw $250M into CCD development, does Nikon get out of the microscope business, etc. Add to that some back channel chatter among people in the industry and a Canon will be able to develop a pretty clear picture of where the competition is going to move over time. They anticipate those moves, wargame out a bunch of product scenarios and calculate a business case for each, then set their own strategic direction to meet the competitions likely threats.

Over the development cycle, CI continues to work on specific product roadmaps, if they don't already have them, and that gets fed to Development to refine the next gen product, which is already in the works.

Within about 4 months from now, The successor of the Rebel XTI will be deep into development in anticipation of what Nikon's D50 replacement will look like. This is why manufacturers always seem to leapfrog each other.

So, the XTi is a response to the D50, and probably a partial response to the D80, but Canon knew about both long before those products were even out of development. I've mentioned before that I work in strategic planning for a printing company that competes against Canon. In our CI group, we have the next 3+ years of product development roadmaps for Canon and other competition. It may change slightly over time but we know about where they will be - technically - in 3 years. The products we have in development now are to meet a threat that doesn't yet exist, but it will.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 01:20 AM
danmitchell
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #6 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


"The 5D shows that FF is not valued by everyone"

Actually it shows that full-frame is still too expensive for everyone. (Recognizing that there would still be some preferring crop over full-frame even if the cost were the same... I think.)

Dan

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 02:46 AM
Hrow
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.44 #7 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


danmitchell wrote:
"The 5D shows that FF is not valued by everyone"

Actually it shows that full-frame is still too expensive for everyone. (Recognizing that there would still be some preferring crop over full-frame even if the cost were the same... I think.)

Dan


Given the choice of between a 5D and a 12MP 1.3X with Series 1 AF and a decent FPS rating I would take the 1.3x in a heart beat - even at a substantial price premium.

In my mind there are three primary reasons for FF that apply to some but not all.

Viewfinder - Yep, FF wins here, until Canon decides to follow Nikon's lead and produce a decent cropped viewfinder.

Lenses - The argument that with FF lenses perform as designed makes the erronous assumption that they perform to their maximum benefit for every photographer. (Note the specific choice of words.) Given that I am shooting long more than I am shooting short the crop factor is a benefit to me. If you rarely go over 200mm then FF wins hands down. If you frequently go longer then the crop camera may have an advantage for you as it does for me.

IQ - Currently the 5D is the price/performance leader (for under 300 mm) but that is a result of a specific set of conditions, only one of which is FF. It really boils down to pixel size, pixel density and the capability of current sensors. Given that we do not know what advances there may be in sensor design with the next / future generations we can not make the assumption that the current way of thinking (pixel size and density) will remain applicable to the same degree.

Think I'm nuts? Look a the 10MP DMR (a CCD crop camera btw) and you will see that it competes with and often bests the FF 16MP 1DsMkII in IQ. The point isn't to say X is better than Y but when thinking about the future we shouldn't get too stuck on the present technology and assume that the criteria we know and have used to form our current opinions will be the basis for the next generation of bodies.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 03:31 AM
Brent Ward
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.44 #8 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


I'm not sure art directors can even see the difference. They love my 1ds II files. I've even see some files they get from MF backs and there is not that much of a difference, not any difference that they can see anyway. Some of the MF files really aren't that great.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 04:18 AM
rebel300
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.44 #9 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Brent Ward wrote:
I'm not sure art directors can even see the difference. They love my 1ds II files. I've even see some files they get from MF backs and there is not that much of a difference, not any difference that they can see anyway. Some of the MF files really aren't that great.



I agree with you 100% Brent.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 12:16 PM
Hrow
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.44 #10 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


rebel300 wrote:
Brent Ward wrote:
I'm not sure art directors can even see the difference. They love my 1ds II files. I've even see some files they get from MF backs and there is not that much of a difference, not any difference that they can see anyway. Some of the MF files really aren't that great.



I agree with you 100% Brent.


We / They are hitting a point of diminishing returns in terms of sensor design and image quality. I'm not saying that things won't get better but the quantum leaps that we have seen over the past five years just aren't going to contnue. To my way of thinking, that is a good thing as it will allow manufacturers to concentrate more resources on other areas that need improvement.

Guy is absolutely right about the need for better wide angles but the lack of good wides has been a historic problem for both Nikon and Canon and I don't see that changing soon. (Personally, I never thought very highly of Nikon's wides either and I have owned a bunch of them.) In the film days when we needed wide we went to a larger format by default but then again, very few photographers who shot professionally in the 70's - late 90's would even think about using 35mm as their primary camera system for anything other than PJ and sports.

While some want better wides, I want better ergonomics as the first priority. There is simply no reason not to have a reasonable MLU. There is no reason to cluster all of the AF points in the center of the frame. There is no reason that they haven't fixed the CF door so that it doesn't lose files if opened accidently even if it is just to shut Phil Askey up. With modern battery technology, there is no reason that a fully capable camera can't be smaller and lighter than the current Series 1. I want displayable grid lines in the view finder. The list goes on and hopefully over time, Canon will see fit to reduce it somewhat.
When they do, I will buy another one of their cameras. If they don't, then I'll pick up a used 1DsMkII and someone else will get my money.









Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 01:29 PM
JCDoss
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #11 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Guy Mancuso wrote:
BTW kudos to one of the better threads on the Canon forum were not everyones at each other throat. I have stopped reading almost all of them lately. Nice to just talk it out for a change


Ditto on that one. I've enjoyed reading this for the past few days.

And look! The Reb even came out to say hi! (Hi Reb!)

Thanks for the discussion all!

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 02:01 PM
Hrow
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.44 #12 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


I doubt that most design enginneers give much stock to the people using their products and I often wonder if they ever even use them themselves.

As a case in point, I had a 1984 BMW 535. Nearly everytime you went to turn the thing on you hit the wiper stalk and turned them on as well. Everyone I knew or met with a 5 Series complained about the same thing. BMW left that way for 11 years. I had the opportunity to talk with BMW's chief engineer for the 5 Series in Germany while displaying at Photokina in the early 90's and made some snide comments about it. He didn't have a clue what I was talking about but about a month later I got a fax from him where he acknowledged the "situation". Not that they fixed it, that didn't come for another 3 or 4 years. My question to this day is didn't anyone at BMW ever even turn the damn car on? Unfortunately, sometimes I suspect that Canon's engineers went to the same School of Oblivioness as BMW's.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 02:16 PM
timbop
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.44 #13 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Guy Mancuso wrote:
Think I'm nuts? Look a the 10MP DMR (a CCD crop camera btw) and you will see that it competes with and often bests the FF 16MP 1DsMkII in IQ

Now that is sounding familar.

Seriously Henry is right. It is NOT all about MPX. It is about the sensor and what it can do, DR, Tonal Range, Micro contrast, AA filter, 16 bit depth and so on. Do you honestly think i would spend all this money and go down in MPX from the 1dsMKII 16mpx to a 10 Mpx camera if it did not perform better. i may be crazy as hell but i ain't stupid .

These are area's tha Canon needs to work on, not more bloody menu items. And i left out the best part of it all is the glass. You know the saying garbage in garbage out. The two go hand in hand great optics and great sensor.

the question is will they work on these area's in the future , they say they will but talk is cheap. We been begging for better wide angle primes. last time i looked there on Pluto and we just threw that out.


Guy, I am not that bright and I am smart enough to completely agree with you! The problem we have is that Canon needs mass market appeal to make the big bucks, and the average person doesn't really want to worry about the real details they just want a simple "goodness" scale like MPX. The PC business realized long ago that it is easier to baffle people with BS (MHz) than to dazzle them with brilliance, and that model has carried into the digital camera biz (MPX). Canon are smart enough to try to keep pros happy, but that is not where they're money is made. Wide angle primes and MLU buttons aren't sexy, and like everything else sex sells products. The in-camera print button is there for the vast majority of people who just want to take snapshots and print them at 4x6. It's actually a brilliant move by canon, because dSLR's are starting to get a mass market appeal for those who just want "better" than their P&S. Simple upping of pixel count is an easy way to show "improvement", especially since 5 years ago small increases in MPX did translate to leaps in image quality. The pavlovian response is now in place, and Moore's law (transistor density doubles every 18 months) still applies IMHO - so the marketing machine marches on.


Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 02:23 PM
EOS20
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #14 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


A little off topic, but I thought some of you might be intrested.

Buy any Sandisk Extreme III card and get a free copy of Capture One LE. They are also offering a 15% discount on the upgrade to Capture One Pro.

For more details and info see:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0608/06083101captureoneextremeiii.asp

http://www.phaseone.com/Global/Campaigns/SanDisk%20info.aspx

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 03:30 PM
rceres
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #15 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Guy,

So why doesn't Leica license the EOS mount (or reverse engineer) and start putting out the real high end cannon len's? Seems like given their business volume and sales prices it wouldn't take many wide angle sales to run a profit. Would it be to hard to adopt the focusing technology to the Leica optics?

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 03:45 PM
Koivulehto
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #16 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Hrow wrote:
I doubt that most design enginneers give much stock to the people using their products and I often wonder if they ever even use them themselves.

As a case in point, I had a 1984 BMW 535. Nearly everytime you went to turn the thing on you hit the wiper stalk and turned them on as well. Everyone I knew or met with a 5 Series complained about the same thing. BMW left that way for 11 years. I had the opportunity to talk with BMW's chief engineer for the 5 Series in Germany while displaying at Photokina in the early 90's and made some snide comments about it. He didn't have a clue what I was talking about but about a month later I got a fax from him where he acknowledged the "situation". Not that they fixed it, that didn't come for another 3 or 4 years. My question to this day is didn't anyone at BMW ever even turn the damn car on? Unfortunately, sometimes I suspect that Canon's engineers went to the same School of Oblivioness as BMW's.


Since the chief engineer bothered to send you a fax, he obviously took your feedback very seriously. But it typically takes (= took in 90's) 3 to 4 years for a change need that is recognized and specified in design to reach the market.

The engineers who design the products often grow so used to their products' old design flaws that they totally stop thinking of them. Another factor contributing to the stubborness of old usability flaws is the company's product management's unwillingness to invest anything into non-sellable features, like they phrase these improvement proposals, in case design engineers happen to suggest them. With today's products, individual design engineers are seldom able to change any part of the existing design just by themselves.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 04:09 PM
DaveMart
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #17 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Guy Mancuso wrote:
I completely 110 percent agree. No question at all about what you just said. But how can we make them think different at least 10 percent of the company. i hate bringing up Leica but reason i do is they build to utmost quality even at the risk of losing it all. Not a great business model but there needs to be some balance. It's wishful thinking i know that but we just have to keep pounding away, I really hope that after 5 years of people screaming at them about the wides , it actually does something. i just like to take the big mouth role on this because i care about it and the industry and frankly other shooters. Someone has to carry the torch, i am trying although it can completely be laughed at. And i am sure I am while they are filling there pockets.

Sounds like 'how to make a small company' - start with a big one.
Unless Canon loose their marbles there is no way they can copy the business model of a small, specialist company - that is like expecting car manufacturers to make custom cars.
I don't really see what the problem is anyway, since apparently Leica action the values you want, so you are surely suited.
Canon make cameras for more generalist use, at a much more reasonable price.
Some critiques are fair, like no grid lines available, and others just miss the point, as for instance in the Canon direct print button.
Most Japanese homes, and for that you can probably read east asian homes, have no computer, and so they need a convenient way of printing at home.
Perhaps we might be able to get the button programmable, but to assume that Canon do not know what they are doing by putting it in just does not take account of the various needs of Canon's customers, or appreciate that there has doubtless been a very careful balancing act going on particularly at this level between the desires of enthusiasts and the needs of the more general population, who after all pay for it.
Not to accept that Canon is a mass-market supplier entirely misses the point, and gives rise to unrealistic expectations and fundamentally misconceived critiques,
Not everyone can afford or wants Leica mechanics and prime glass.
Regards,
DaveMart

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 04:11 PM
jwil
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #18 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


DaveMart wrote:
Guy Mancuso wrote:
I completely 110 percent agree. No question at all about what you just said. But how can we make them think different at least 10 percent of the company. i hate bringing up Leica but reason i do is they build to utmost quality even at the risk of losing it all. Not a great business model but there needs to be some balance. It's wishful thinking i know that but we just have to keep pounding away, I really hope that after 5 years of people screaming at them about the wides , it actually does something. i just like to take the big mouth role on this because i care about it and the industry and frankly other shooters. Someone has to carry the torch, i am trying although it can completely be laughed at. And i am sure I am while they are filling there pockets.

Sounds like 'how to make a small company' - start with a big one.
Unless Canon loose their marbles there is no way they can copy the business model of a small, specialist company - that is like expecting car manufacturers to make custom cars.
I don't really see what the problem is anyway, since apparently Leica action the values you want, so you are surely suited.
Canon make cameras for more generalist use, at a much more reasonable price.
Some critiques are fair, like no grid lines available, and others just miss the point, as for instance in the Canon direct print button.
Most Japanese homes, and for that you can probably read east asian homes, have no computer, and so they need a convenient way of printing at home.
Perhaps we might be able to get the button programmable, but to assume that Canon do not know what they are doing by putting it in just does not take account of the various needs of Canon's customers, or appreciate that there has doubtless been a very careful balancing act going on particularly at this level between the desires of enthusiasts and the needs of the more general population, who after all pay for it.
Not to accept that Canon is a mass-market supplier entirely misses the point, and gives rise to unrealistic expectations and fundamentally misconceived critiques,
Not everyone can afford or wants Leica mechanics and prime glass.
Regards,
DaveMart


I really couldn't agree with your post more, Dave. Excellent point and well said.

Canon is in the business of satisfying the widest possible cross section of consumers in order to drive revenue and profit. Of course, as the saying goes, "you can't please all of the people all of the time" and it's never more true than in marketing and product planning.

If Canon made a product for every niche and demand they would develop a byzantine, unfocused, mess of a product line that would quickly put them out of business. So, thankfully we have a free market where competition flourishes and competitors like Kodak on the low end and Leica on the high end fill specialist voids left by the broadly appealing Canon product line.

Guy, as you've already mentioned, Leica produces products with sometimes questionable profit margins for the specialist shooter. Why would you expect Canon to dilute it's line by offering a similar low margin product against an established competitor? That's strategic suicide. It would create a resource burn in Canon R&D, Marketing, Supply Chain Management, etc, and Nikon would use it to their advantage to attack the core Canon product line.

Carrying the torch for a superior product line, while noble, is futile. As I mentioned before in a much earlier post, large corporations care about consumer demands and expectations only as far as required to separate Joe Customer from his money. The second part of that statement is that if there isn't enough money involved, then the coproration is just as happy to send Joe Customer to the competition to be a resource drain on them.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 04:54 PM
JRMDC
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #19 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Lots of good points, Dave. Interesting comment about printing in places where computers are not as prevalent. I wonder, though, why a Japanese home would have a printer if they have no computer. Do you instead mean those households need a convenient way to print at a kiosk somewhere? More convenient than removing the CF card and putting it in the machine?

One can't expect Canon to behave like a Leica, just as one cannot expect Leica to come to the market with a camera at Canon prices. Leica is a firm pursuing niche markets.

I've always wondered about the Canon wides - so many people complain about them. I am satisfied with my 35/2 image quality for my purposes, but I wonder, every time I use it, why Canon has never chosen to put in a fix to get rid of the buzzy focus mechanism.

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 05:00 PM
DaveMart
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #20 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


JRMDC wrote:
Lots of good points, Dave. Interesting comment about printing in places where computers are not as prevalent. I wonder, though, why a Japanese home would have a printer if they have no computer. Do you instead mean those households need a convenient way to print at a kiosk somewhere? More convenient than removing the CF card and putting it in the machine?

One can't expect Canon to behave like a Leica, just as one cannot expect Leica to come to the market with a camera at Canon prices. Leica is a firm pursuing niche markets.

I've always wondered about the Canon wides - so many people complain about them. I am satisfied with my 35/2 image quality for my purposes, but I wonder, every time I use it, why Canon has never chosen to put in a fix to get rid of the buzzy focus mechanism.

The direct print button.
Dunno the full ins and outs of it, just some of the guys who live in Japan said that that was the way it works there.
I would imagine that it all fits in with the way Canon are looking at ' the total imaging solution' - there are a lot of those small printers about now, which do little 6 by 4 prints - many find them very handy.
As an aside, it is interesting that Canon have put the same button on the 5D.
Actually, I believe this could be handy for some pros, who do things like shots of school graduation ceremonies or school sports - it is lot better for business if you can just turn out the prints then and there for the admiring relations, and handy if you can do it without having to lug a laptop.
Primes - or the lack of
It is noticeable that Nikon have not bothered doing much about the primes for the DX either, alhtough I believe there are some difficulties about doing this as the DX format is compromised by the need to remain compatible with FF lenses, and consequently you can't make the savings in size, weight and cost that you would expect from the smaller format, so it boils down to the 14mm you have to make to get an equivalent of the 20mm at FF being darn difficult to make and costing a fortune just like the FF ones.
That really just points up the answer to the question though - if there were much money in it, we would already have WA primes from Canon, or more of them.
Just the same though, I think Canon do think of themselves as imaging solutions providers, rather than going for the bottom line all the time - look at the totally uneconomic 20a - so perhaps we can hope that we get something eventually.
They have also said that they are going to concentrate on their lenses, and have turned out a couple of new primes this time.
Frustrating, though.
Regards,
DaveMart


Edited by DaveMart on Aug 31, 2006 at 06:31 PM GMT

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 05:50 PM
danmitchell
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #21 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


"There is simply no reason not to have a reasonable MLU."

Now THAT is something we can all agree about! :-)

Dan

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 06:03 PM
rebel300
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.44 #22 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


JCDoss wrote:
Guy Mancuso wrote:
BTW kudos to one of the better threads on the Canon forum were not everyones at each other throat. I have stopped reading almost all of them lately. Nice to just talk it out for a change


Ditto on that one. I've enjoyed reading this for the past few days.

And look! The Reb even came out to say hi! (Hi Reb!)

Thanks for the discussion all!



Hey JC...yeah, this is enjoyable to read...good to see you visiting also.

I've never been as satisfied with photography as I am since getting the 1Ds2 over a year ago...quite possibly, once someone finds a camera they totally enjoy the search ends...At 70 years old and not as steady as I used to be I find the weight of the 1Ds2 to my advantage...I teach high end film to digital converts processing in CS2 and as a result have many Leica and Zeis super wides at my disposal, but really don't shoot super wides but about three days a year, so the out-resolving issue people talk about is a non issue with me as I pretty live at 28-75mm in most of my shooting...the rest are teles at 135 and 400...so I can take everything with me in that small Kata backpack.

Hope Canon comes out with that 3D just for you...you sure have been patient.

Best to all,
LM

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 06:10 PM
JRMDC
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #23 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


DaveMart wrote:
As an aside, it is interesting that Canon have put the same button on the 5D.
Actually, I believe this could be handy for some pros, who do things like shots of school graduation ceremonies or school sports - it is lot better for business if you can just turn out the prints then and there for the admiring relations, and handy if you can do it without having to lug a laptop.


Interesting. I wonder how many photographers have put this possibility into practice.


That really just points up the answer to the question though - if there were much money in it, we would already have WA primes from Canon, or more of them.
Just the same though, I think Canon do think of themselves as imaging solutions providers, rather than going for the bottom line all the time - look at the totally uneconomic 20a - so perhaps we can hope that we get something eventually.
They have also said that they are going to concentrate on their lenses, and have turned out a couple of new primes this time.


I wonder sometimes whether Canon committed to the best teles first - I have the sense that the great teles for sports really put their name on the map as far as grabbing market share from Nikon after they introduced EOS - for ongoing marketing reasons, knowing that they are less likely to increase either pro market share, or their public image as far as supporting the pros, which helps in their consumer sales, if they improve their wides. No one sees Canon white wide angles on TV! The pro level stuff is lucrative, but what makes it more lucrative is the glow it shines down on the consumer stuff.

I certainly think the last wide they will see the benefit of updating is the 35/2! Note the prime they upgraded was the 85/1.2, an elite lens. And of course the 50/1.2 is an elite lens, albeit one that has the added advantage of creating an elite portrait lens for the APS-C crowd.



Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 06:12 PM
Numfar
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.44 #24 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Whether or not most Asian homes have computers, I rather think the reason that Canon introduced the Print button on their cameras is because Canon is also in the business of selling printers. One supports the other. Seems like 'synergy' between products, or whatever the current buzzword may be. Simple as that.


Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 06:23 PM
DaveMart
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.44 #25 · 'Unofficial' Photokina RUMOR Thread


Numfar wrote:
Whether or not most Asian homes have computers, I rather think the reason that Canon introduced the Print button on their cameras is because Canon is also in the business of selling printers. One supports the other. Seems like 'synergy' between products, or whatever the current buzzword may be. Simple as that.

Of course it is - Canon make no bones about it that they want you shooting with your Canon camera after choosing the picture style you fancy, viewing it on your SED Toshiba/Canon monitor or TV, and printing out on a Canon printer.
If you are a pro though, you will have the option of putting it through your computer (non-Canon!) and using your Canon software to adjust the shot first!

Regards,
DaveMart:

Edited on Oct 08, 2006 at 08:06 PM


Aug 31, 2006 at 06:39 PM

FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload
1 2 3 43
44
45 83 84 end
  Go to previous topic Go to next topic

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost password?