uz2work Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.2 #5 · So how many 20D brethren jumping to the 30? | |
I've used a 20D as a back-up/second body to my 1DII. It has served me very well. If I didn't have a 20D, I'd look forward to getting the 30D to use as a second body because of the spot meter, ability to adjust ISO in 1/3 stop increments, and larger RAW buffer alone. However, since I already have a 20D, it will serve me fine. While I like the ability to adjust ISO in 1/3 stop increments on my 1DII, being "stuck" with full stop increments is something I can live with. The larger RAW buffer would be nice, but, even as a burst shooter, at "only" 5 fps, I don't fill up the buffer on the 20D that often, and, even when I do, it clears so fast that the buffer depth is almost irrelevant. Even if the 20D buffer does fill, a second or so later, it can shoot another 3 or 4 shot burst. The spot meter would be nice, but it is not essential. I don't chimp a lot, and, to me, the larger LCD is irrelevant. For me, the AF on the 20D gets the job done, and, if I use it properly, will continue to do so. The other changes are irrelevant.
Just as I didn't feel that, for me, "upgrading" from the 1DII to the N was worth spending the money, I feel the same way about the 30D. Both my 1DII and my 20D will take pictures that are just as good as an N or a 30D, even though the replacements might have more "convenience" features. So, I'll just save the money for the moment and put it toward my 1DIII or combined 1-series that should be available in about a year.
Les
Edited on Feb 22, 2006 at 05:46 PM
|