ibilly Offline Image Upload: Off
|
jdaily wrote:
ibilly wrote:
The images it puts out are the most important part of the entire camera, and I'd take 11MP @ higher noise
I find that contradictory, but I accept that everyone has their own tradeoffs.
esp. if I could set it at ~8 MP with ~no noise.
And it's hard to imagine how you could pull this one off. It's not like the D2X; to achieve what you want, you'd have to turn off pixels scattered throughout the sensor. If you just select the "middle" 8MP, you'd still have the same pixel density and hence the same basic noise characteristics.
Edited by jdaily on Feb 21, 2006 at 09:13 PM GMT (Reason: Original text was a bit OTT)
To me, marginal noise is secondary to sharpness and enlargement potential. I realize taht many people prefer their images to be on the cleaner side, but interpolation can only go so far if the image data isn't there in the first place.
on the 8MP mode, I do realize that it would be incredibly complicated sampling wise, but then again, there are cameras like the Sigma 1 color & 3 chips and the (not sure of the brand) HDR camera with differently sized pixels.
canon are the noise wizards. I stand by my desire/request for more MP's. On a semi-related note, why aren't we seeing any of these noise free wonderchips in the Powershot series?
Edited on Feb 23, 2006 at 12:06 AM
|