Jman13 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
Sprout Crumble wrote:
Its not about a direct D200 competitor Jman, its about broadening and developing Canons biggest selling digital format.
Of course it is! Which is why the 30D makes sense...if they released a massively improved camera, it would be very close to the 5D, and priced accordingly...leaving a HUGE jump for those to go from the Rebel XT to a 30D. If they inserted a camera into the 20D->5D area, you've got market saturation, with 5 different models, all very close to one another....not smart either.
The 30D just brings so little to the range that it can only be seen as a huge disappointment. Its a 20Dn. If Canon had released it as such and another higher model for around $2000, I'd have been very happy indeed.
As it stands, APS-C as a format has not advanced one iota and the range is still unbalanced.
I think the range is very balanced...perhaps not in a price point situation, but capability wise it is. You've got budget (Rebel XT - $850), Prosumer (3D - $1399), compact professional (5D - $2800), Professional sports (1DIIn - $4000) and Professional, top IQ (1DsII - $7700). Not a bad lineup. Charging $2000 for the 'prosumer' camera would KILL sales, and making the 30D essentially a 5D or better with a 1.6x sensor would overlap WAY too much with the 5D.
True, the 30D isn't a direct competitor to the D200...so what? Nikon has no direct competitor to the 5D?
For those of you who just HAVE to upgrade every year, yeah, you might be a bit disappointed, but I think this gives us a fantastic camera. The 30D is now a practically flawless (not completely, but VERY close) prosumer DSLR. There's very little that one could want in a mid-range body. Want superior autofocus, resolution galore and weather sealing? Go 1-Series. Want full frame? Go 5D. Want a well built, do everything in a compact package at a reasonable price? The 30D is PERFECT for that.
I think too many people expected a D200 at the 20D's price point...and that was never going to happen.
|