darylc Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #3 · Rumour?! - EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | |
make a wide-zoom that is superior to the 16-35 and 17-40Ls, but mount it only on consumer grade bodies, thus cannibalising both L glass sales and pro-body sales?
Not really. Full frame is still full-frame. I doubt that anyone spending 3,000-8,000 dollars on a pro body would suddenly buy a 1.6x camera instead, just so they could save a couple hundred bucks on the lens. Actually, now that I'm typing that idea out, it seems even more ridiculous.
What they might cannibalize is the excellent Sigma 18-50/2.8. This lens is faster than the 17-40, and lighter to boot (because it doesn't have a wastefully large FF image circle).
Image stabilization on a fast 17-55 lens makes no sense though.
|