gugs Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #7 · "Wide" happy new year from Bruges | |
camerapapi wrote:
You know Guy, many times I just wonder if we make the right decisions when buying lenses. I am not referring to your 10.5mm fisheye, I am talking about the 12-24 Tokina.
How many times in these forums, and even in other forums, I read that the Tokina was such a bad choice because it was not sharp and because of the CA. I see pictures like yours and I begin to wonder if indeed the Tokina is a bad choice! Those pictures are superb.
Unquestionably, regardless of the quality of an optic, you have to know how to use the lens. When using independent lenses sample variation is going to be a problem because their quality control is not as good as that of the Big Boys and even the Big Boys have quality control problems and you see sample variation from time to time.
I tested the Tokina and also the Nikkor. I was not impressed with any of them. Maybe I did not shoot under ideal conditions, maybe I have to go back and repeat my test but the more I see the results from the Tokina the more it makes me think.
I am not saying I have not seen awesome pictures from the Nikkor also but in my humble opinion the lens is overpriced. It is not built like a professional lens but they surely nail you with a premium price.
Beautiful pictures Guy. I am glad I looked.
William Rodriguez
Miami, Florida.
William,
Thanks for your comments.
About the Tokina, I have 3 colleagues now at the office who have bought one and everybody is very happy until now. I never suffered from any CA issues.
The only thing (I already mentioned this in other threads) is that the Tokina is a bit prone to flare if you are not careful. It seems that the Nikkor is better with that respect. Otherwise, that lens is a keeper and I really enjoy shooting with the Tokina...
Edited on Jan 04, 2006 at 10:35 PM
|