D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

Moderated by: guardian

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
Nikon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums | Nikon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload
end

Dimme
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #1 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

Look at the difference, a small sensor isn't that bad....
http://www.pbase.com/stevehorn/image/50264157
http://www.pbase.com/image/52399858

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 09:57 PM

MPerdomo
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #2 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

Of course the D200 will look good when you smooth out all the details

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 10:07 PM

r_o_b_s_o_n
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #3 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

and post at about 6.25% of full size...

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 10:10 PM

enforcerbr
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #4 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

I thought I clicked the button for the Canon forum for a moment when I read this threads title.
Come on, you can't possibily compare noise with resized photos shot under completely different lighting conditions, foca lenghts, apertures, etc...

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 10:24 PM

bellyface
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.1 #5 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

apples to apples. oranges to oranges... the 5D and the D200 are both i different places.

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 10:28 PM

thebeephaha
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #6 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

Their not even in the same class really, the two cams I mean. Way different...

However that being said, lets face it both do a good job at what they are supposed to do.

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 10:51 PM

azpatrick2000
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #7 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

The D200 image was run through Neat Image, wasn't it?

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 11:03 PM

Marli
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #8 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

MPerdomo wrote:
Of course the D200 will look good when you smooth out all the details

It does look good. Canon have been doing this for years..

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 28, 2005 at 11:53 PM

johnnymg
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #9 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

Dimme wrote:
Look at the difference, a small sensor isn't that bad....
http://www.pbase.com/stevehorn/image/50264157
http://www.pbase.com/image/52399858

Neither image looks that 'great' actually. The Nikon image does appear to be more processed.

Not sure what this sort of "comparison" can lead too.

JohnG

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 29, 2005 at 05:01 AM

jmcfadden
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #10 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

let's just wait for the camera OK

J

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 29, 2005 at 05:02 AM

Roel
Offline
Buy and Sell: On

p.1 #11 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

jmcfadden wrote:
let's just wait for the camera OK

Hear, hear!

Edited on Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM

Nov 29, 2005 at 03:29 PM

uccmmcpo
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #12 · D200 vs 5D 1600 iso

Something closer to the truth will be realized a lot more in the resultant printed images with 99% of them being done at 8 X 12 or smaller sizes.
Any IQ or resolution advantages the much larger 5D sensor might have will just not be fully appreciated by the masses these two cameras are marketed toward.
Images blown and shown at 100% on screen or printed at 20 X 30 will have to be pixel peeped to expose the differences anyway.
Someone will always be reminding you that the marginal gain simply wasn`t worth the cost. ( rule of diminishing return)
John

Nov 30, 2005 at 01:05 PM


FM Forums \| Nikon-mount SLRs \| Join Image Upload end