PhotoPhreak Offline Image Upload: Off
|
Ken Tanaka wrote:
Patience is generally rewarded.
But if you're really itching for a 24-105 there are other brands available. I recently bought a relatively inexpensive Sigma 24-105 f/2.8-4.0 mainly as a lightweight walk-about lens for my 10D, but also to see how useful the focal range really would be. I was actually quite surprised by this little $200 lens. No, it's not L glass but it's really not bad! Yes, I have a Canon 24-105 on back-order but this little Sigma will suffice for my current purposes. (In fact, I shot my WA 179 entry with this lens: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/295677 )
Alternatively, you could look for a good deal on a 24-70L f/2.8 which is still a wonderful lens. Many are up for sale right now.
Ken,
are you using the little Sigma on a FF or a crop body? Thanks in advance.
Sheila, can you please let us know the results of your tests, especially with regard to the flare problem everyone is talking about, thanks in advance.
|