Tom_W Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #19 · Modded 5D and Leica Lenses | |
wheaton wrote:
I have to say I am confused by all this. Kurt said that removing part of the miror has no side effects - ie even with the mirror cut smaller you can still see all of the full frame image.
If this is the case, why did canon make the mirror so big in the first place?
I'm thinking, and I could be way, way off, that the mirror has to be large enough to accomodate all Canon's lenses. Yes, the image circle (actually, the diagonal; it doesn't have to be a circle) has to be 43 mm (+/-) as projected on the sensor, but that projection can come from a smaller rear lens circle like my fisheye which has about a 22 mm diameter rearmost lens. Conversely, it can come from longer telephotos which project an image that is almost straight - that is, the corner-to-corner diameter of the rearward projection is close to the 43 mm necessary to cover the entire image circle.
If you drew a ray-trace of the various lenses, the longer telephotos would present long, parallel light rays, while many of the mid-range or shorter lenses would have rays that tend to fan out from a smaller-diameter rear lens. Those longer lenses may be the ones that require the most mirror coverage, and might be the only ones that would show the effects of a shaved mirror in the viewfinder.
|