chemprof Offline Image Upload: On
|
Josstover wrote:
Hi,
I'm not at all satisfied with my Nikon Kit lense. It's just too soft. Im making pictures of architeçture most of the time, so I need very sharp results. I'm thinking of buying a new zoom lense but can't afford Nikon stuff. I am thinking of purchasing the 17-35 mm 2.8-4 Tamron lense of which I read good reviews on this site. Is there anybody who has experiences with this lense or any alternative. Will it be better dan the Nikon kitlens (which costs about the same?)
Jos
If you're not getting sharp results you may have a bad copy of the kit lens, as it is quite sharp at all focal lengths. For architecture, however, the distortion may be a bit high. The Sigma 12-24 is excellent for architecture, as it has very little distortion even at its widest end. Don't know what you'd use to fill in at the longer end, as I am extremely happy with my kit lens.
Gerald
Edited on Sep 30, 2005 at 06:35 AM
|