RDKirk Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.15 #9 · Canon EOS 5D. New camera. Pics. | |
Flappie wrote:
Well,
I don't really buy this 'leak'. I guess it's the '1D markII N' that is a bit over the top... That naming is just ridiculous... What will the next 1D be named? "1D Mark II N Mark II"?
Canon uses the "n" to indicate that there have been minor changes made--more than a firmware fix, not enough to change the actual name. There won't be an "n" engraved on the camera.
And a Canon EOS 5D when minolta is bringing out a Minolta 5D consumer model? Seems rather strange to me.
So? Canon brought out their premier F-1 when Nikon had their own premier F1.
Furthermore, a 3000-4000 EUR camera with a mode dial? Ahum...
If this camera has a mode dial, we only know it from the photos we've seen (which may or may not be authentic). But if we're believing it has a mode dial from those photos, then from those photos we also see that the mode dial does not have the "Basic Zone" settings. The camera is not weathersealed, so there's no reason for it not to have a dial rather than buttons.
But... the specs?
They are really nice. Face it, everyone hoping canon to introduce a tweener and expecting a 1DsmarkII in a smaller body for 50% of the price are just unrealistic. Canon wants some people to pay the premium for the 1DsII...
And no, it is not a superfast camera, but it fills up a nice niche market (studio work and landscape). I guess Canon judges the 1DmarkII at the moment more than adequate for those needing a speedgun (sport photography)
The 20D is a junior 1D, the 5D would be a junior 1Ds. The 20D is $3500 cheaper than the 1D, the 5D would be $5000 cheaper than the 1Ds.
Considering that this camera would have been planned two or three years ago, I suspect that Canon was actually aiming at Kodak's niche. If Kodak were still in the business, that's what the comparison would be with, and it would be a clearly superior camera to Kodak's offering.
|