moondigger Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
Username wrote:
You bet. I can't find the original to get the exif data right now but I think it was 1/60 at F6.somehting ISO200.
Here's a larger version to do it more justice. Full Crop.
|
|
|
|
http://img225.exs.cx/img225/8159/moontrees1ct.jpg |
|
|
|
|
Look, I'm not trying to be a jerk by questioning you on this. It's just that a 200mm lens can't do what's in that photo. When you say "full crop" are you implying that it's the full frame? i.e., not cropped at all? Or are you saying that's a 100% crop, meaning the frame was much larger and that most of the blackness in the outer parts of the frame have been trimmed away?
I've taken many, many photos of the moon -- including some with the 70-200/4L, both with and without a 1.4x teleconverter. There's just no way you could fill that much of the frame with that lens unless it's a severe crop. And even if it is a severe crop, the treeline silhouetted against the moon doesn't look to scale. I'd have guessed your shot was a composite.
Again, I'm not trying to be a jerk here. I'm just wondering what went into that photo.
|