 |
sippinsoma Offline [ X ]
|
cmM. wrote:
unless you want to use the lens for something other than landscapes as well, I suggest the 17-40. The focal length difference is minimal, and I doubt you'll be taking many landscapes @ f/2.8. It'll save you a lot of money.
I had thought about the 17-40, but I do quite a bit of night and indoor shooting so the 2.8 would kill two birds with one stone. Unfortunately, it may be quite some time before I can raise that kind of cash I just picked up the 135L for candids so I'm flat broke for the time being.
One day...
|
| Oct 23, 2004 at 07:18 AM |
| |
|
 |