fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

Archive 2016 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)

  
 
cgarcia
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Caution note: in the case of 1DX vs D4S the ISO levels nearly matched (DXO reported the ISOs 100/51200 as ISOs 80/39560 for the 1DX and 75/38592 for the D4S). But we still don't know which are the 1DX2 and D5 true ISO levels, or if they continue being comparable.

https://lightful.github.io/talk/photo/sensor/1DX2_D5__DR.png

So, the D5 gets about 0.5 EV extra of high ISO performance compared to 1DX2 (in fact about 0.25 EV better than 1DX, except at ISO 51200). And the 1DX2 at low ISO turns 1.5 to 1 EV better compared to D5 (in fact 0.25-0.5 EV better than it was the D4 if we mix with DXO data). Yes, Canon has tried to catch Nikon at the same time that Nikon tried to catch Canon resulting in that both exchange seats and continue uncaught!.

Perhaps what we should be comparing is the D4 vs 1DX2 and the D5 vs 1DX:

https://lightful.github.io/talk/photo/sensor/1DX_D5__DR.png

The forums were expecting from the D5 a huge jump at high ISO over Canon, but this is not the case. At ISO 51200, the old 1DX has a read noise of less than 81 DN (see https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1421137) compared to almost 92 DN of Nikon D5 (see at the end of this post): both values yield equivalent dynamic range, once substracted the black level and accounted for the slight megapixels difference.

To calculate the DR, the brightest non burned pixel value is compared with the read noise at each ISO level. Unfortunately, dcraw doesn't finds masked pixels on D5 RAW files. So, any ordinary shot is not usable for the task. The read noise for these graphs has been calculated from specially taken "dark frames" (shoot at 1/8000, apparently with the body cap in place). On this way, what should be a perfect black picture, turns to be not so black, due to the noise (which we can then measure). Fortunately, the D5 doesn't clips values under 0: when there is no light, the ADC may get slightly positive and negative values due to noise, but recent Nikons add here an offset and later doesn't discards the values under it (if this were not the case, the read noise would be far more difficult to be accurately obtained).

Strangely, the read noise (standard deviation of the RAW data in the dark frame) is different in the D5 red, green and blue channels. I once readed that Nikon partially corrects for white balance in the RAW, and I suspect that maybe this is the case with the D5 (the red seems multiplied by about 1.26 and the blue by about 1.17). So, the real sensor performance is likely even better. I could have used the (more favourable) green standard deviation (G1 or G2 values) but we are measuring DR and, since this "cooking" of the RAW effectively decreases the dynamic range in the blue and red channels (by prematurely clipping their highlights) it is fair to take it into account. One can not understand why manufacturers still manipulate (damage) the RAW data instead of storing a metadata flag (e.g. "channel X must be multiplied by Y") which would allow to handle these adjustments during the RAW conversion in a non destructive way. Also is strange that, at huge ISO levels, one green channel seems consistently more noisy than the other.

So finally, the standard deviation used to measure the read noise is labeled as "R+G1+G2+B" (see the data at the end of this post) to represent the aggregation of the partial standard deviations of each channel, which is very similar to the value got if we totally ignore the bayer matrix (labeled as "RGGB"). I only had a dark frame for each ISO level, except for ISO 100, where several were available. So, it was possible to do an additional test at ISO 100: calculate the noise in the image resulting from substracting two dark frames, which accounts for variations in the pixel-to-pixel sensitivity, or for patterns caused by the electronics, removing false noise. In this second test, the read noise measured was 5.64662, nearly identical to the read noise in the frames before substraction (5.65481 and 5.64517).

Note: The ISO 800 read noise is a bit strange on D5, but the skew is consistent, and the camera settings seem correct. I'd take the D5 DR plot at ISO 800 with a grain of salt, because I did not have another additional file to double-check (as I had with the 1DX2 at ISO 400, where the singularity there was confirmed as true).

Warning: I have assumed a saturation level of 16382 (the maximum possible DN) because I had no overexposed shots to determine it. In case some ISO level doesn't reach this level, the D5 estimated DR would be slightly lower (maybe by 0.1 or 0.2 EV). Also for that reason the intermediate ISOs DR is not plot (their RAW saturation value will not be 16382 if are fake and were implemented by applying a negative exposure compensation).

Yes, the D5 intermediate ISOs are fake (digital gain) causing the read noise (as well as the dynamic range) to "jump" when the next ISO is native and the noise/DR suddenly improves. The only way to avoid this (unless the sensor were ISO invariant, not the case of D5) is to use analog gain. Canon never has used fake digital ISOs in a 1D body, only in inferior models (5D series included, with the exception of the 5DS). We hope that Nikon has a compelling technical reason for doing this in a flagship model:

https://lightful.github.io/talk/photo/sensor/D5_readnoise_a.png

These are likely the ISO mappings:

ISO 100 -> 125 (100+1/3EV) -> 160 (100+2/3EV)
ISO 200 -> 250 (200+1/3EV) -> 320 (100+2/3EV)
ISO 400 -> 500 (400+1/3EV)
ISO 800 -> 640 (800-1/3EV) -> 1000 (800+1/3EV)
ISO 1600 -> 1250 (1600-1/3EV) -> 2000 (1600+1/3EV)
ISO 3200 -> 2500 (3200-1/3EV) -> 4000 (3200+1/3EV)
...

Starting from ISO 800 it seems that Nikon uses the Canon way of faking ISO (some Canon users love ISO 160 because its cleaner shadows... in truth due to the forced 1/3 EV exposure to the right). Interestingly, the D5 has a rare DR drop at ISO 800, when such switching occurs (but not necessarily due to that). To easily determine what is occurring we would need frames with a bit of the image area overexposed, to detect if the max value in the histogram has decreased during the fake ISO exposure adjusting. Likewise, ISOs beyond 6400 likely aren't native:

https://lightful.github.io/talk/photo/sensor/D5_readnoise_b.png

Some curious facts from the histograms... The pixels values are from 0 to 16383, being 400 the "black" (with some random fluctuation around it due to read noise) and 16383 the overexposure level. There is a max DN of 16383 at ISO 40000, caused by a single blue pixel. By ISO 3276800 (remember: despite the body cap in place and shooting at 1/8000) about 0.4% of the image is overexposed (instead of black) and about 49.4% of the image pixels (no matter the color channel) are set to the opposite value (DN 0). With just half of the image 100% warranted as noise, maybe then Nikon judged that this was enough and decided not to continue upping the ISO. Perhaps the last usable ISO is 204800, because its black level (418.491) is still around where it suposedly should be (the EXIF always stores the exact value 400):

https://lightful.github.io/talk/photo/sensor/D5_noise_clip.png

Bellow is the data used for the graphs. The formula to calculate the DR is:

log2((16382 - DN mean) / read noise) + 0.661

With 0.661 = log2(sqrt(20.0/8)) being the adjust from 20MP into 8MP, and using "R+G1+G2+B" as read noise. The D5 read noise values can be compared to the ones of the 1DX2 posted in another thread (see https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1421137) because both cameras have approximately the same parameters (same saturation values, similar black level, same pixel size).

PS: I still don't believe how these D5 RAWs could appear in my hard disk... who and when leaved them there?. I have only look at the noise (which I assume is legal, even if you are not the photo owner) and immediately have deleted them...


D5 ISO 50
stdev: R=6.36524, G1=5.06813, G2=5.03189, B=5.97156, RGGB=5.64039, R+G1+G2+B=5.63874
DN mean=400.819, DN min=368, DN max=435, DR(20MP)=11.4687, DR(8MP)=12.1297 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 64
stdev: R=6.35862, G1=5.08126, G2=5.03109, B=5.96864, RGGB=5.65855, R+G1+G2+B=5.63888
DN mean=400.476, DN min=368, DN max=440, DR(20MP)=11.4687, DR(8MP)=12.1297 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 80
stdev: R=6.36609, G1=5.04444, G2=5.04357, B=5.98107, RGGB=5.64205, R+G1+G2+B=5.6388
DN mean=400.669, DN min=366, DN max=437, DR(20MP)=11.4687, DR(8MP)=12.1297 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 100
stdev: R=6.35951, G1=5.03679, G2=5.03171, B=5.94736, RGGB=5.67171, R+G1+G2+B=5.62365
DN mean=400.403, DN min=368, DN max=450, DR(20MP)=11.4726, DR(8MP)=12.1336 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 125
stdev: R=7.98868, G1=6.34655, G2=6.34754, B=7.48438, RGGB=7.0783, R+G1+G2+B=7.07822
DN mean=400.744, DN min=361, DN max=458, DR(20MP)=11.1407, DR(8MP)=11.8017 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 160
stdev: R=9.97347, G1=7.96967, G2=7.99731, B=9.3667, RGGB=8.87046, R+G1+G2+B=8.86958
DN mean=400.485, DN min=349, DN max=468, DR(20MP)=10.8153, DR(8MP)=11.4762 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 200
stdev: R=6.5399, G1=5.36858, G2=5.3326, B=6.03176, RGGB=5.84462, R+G1+G2+B=5.83975
DN mean=400.782, DN min=367, DN max=493, DR(20MP)=11.4182, DR(8MP)=12.0791 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 250
stdev: R=8.16488, G1=6.6316, G2=6.6266, B=7.57708, RGGB=7.28072, R+G1+G2+B=7.27955
DN mean=400.733, DN min=359, DN max=505, DR(20MP)=11.1002, DR(8MP)=11.7612 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 320
stdev: R=10.2464, G1=8.28252, G2=8.28328, B=9.57051, RGGB=9.14396, R+G1+G2+B=9.13505
DN mean=400.719, DN min=350, DN max=549, DR(20MP)=10.7727, DR(8MP)=11.4336 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 400
stdev: R=7.46961, G1=5.90713, G2=5.86575, B=6.91834, RGGB=6.60023, R+G1+G2+B=6.57571
DN mean=400.651, DN min=361, DN max=559, DR(20MP)=11.247, DR(8MP)=11.9079 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 500
stdev: R=9.3454, G1=7.36765, G2=7.36419, B=8.70215, RGGB=8.2501, R+G1+G2+B=8.2398
DN mean=400.193, DN min=346, DN max=604, DR(20MP)=10.9215, DR(8MP)=11.5825 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 640
stdev: R=8.01137, G1=6.35549, G2=6.35361, B=7.50301, RGGB=7.0997, R+G1+G2+B=7.09291
DN mean=400.527, DN min=358, DN max=687, DR(20MP)=11.1377, DR(8MP)=11.7987 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 800
stdev: R=10.0591, G1=7.93947, G2=7.97341, B=9.39694, RGGB=8.89016, R+G1+G2+B=8.88957
DN mean=400.681, DN min=345, DN max=694, DR(20MP)=10.812, DR(8MP)=11.4729 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 1000
stdev: R=12.2977, G1=9.80774, G2=9.79971, B=11.5083, RGGB=10.9515, R+G1+G2+B=10.9076
DN mean=400.9, DN min=336, DN max=791, DR(20MP)=10.5168, DR(8MP)=11.1778 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 1250
stdev: R=8.37332, G1=6.61912, G2=6.61318, B=7.82728, RGGB=7.4128, R+G1+G2+B=7.39807
DN mean=400.819, DN min=354, DN max=958, DR(20MP)=11.0769, DR(8MP)=11.7379 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 1600
stdev: R=10.4396, G1=8.31614, G2=8.30548, B=9.77402, RGGB=9.27179, R+G1+G2+B=9.2555
DN mean=400.504, DN min=343, DN max=1050, DR(20MP)=10.7538, DR(8MP)=11.4148 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 2000
stdev: R=12.8406, G1=10.2222, G2=10.2064, B=11.981, RGGB=11.3805, R+G1+G2+B=11.3698
DN mean=400.162, DN min=322, DN max=1169, DR(20MP)=10.457, DR(8MP)=11.118 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 2500
stdev: R=9.7205, G1=7.74474, G2=7.6924, B=9.0864, RGGB=8.60567, R+G1+G2+B=8.6053
DN mean=400.939, DN min=327, DN max=1597, DR(20MP)=10.8588, DR(8MP)=11.5198 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 3200
stdev: R=12.2446, G1=9.68939, G2=9.64986, B=11.4253, RGGB=10.8346, R+G1+G2+B=10.8106
DN mean=400.537, DN min=312, DN max=1629, DR(20MP)=10.5297, DR(8MP)=11.1907 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 4000
stdev: R=15.0775, G1=11.9887, G2=11.9277, B=14.0164, RGGB=13.3252, R+G1+G2+B=13.3209
DN mean=400.516, DN min=285, DN max=2067, DR(20MP)=10.2285, DR(8MP)=10.8895 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 5000
stdev: R=13.1327, G1=10.3626, G2=10.2947, B=12.1643, RGGB=11.5554, R+G1+G2+B=11.5521
DN mean=400.946, DN min=272, DN max=2668, DR(20MP)=10.434, DR(8MP)=11.095 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 6400
stdev: R=16.5034, G1=13.0338, G2=12.9327, B=15.2941, RGGB=14.524, R+G1+G2+B=14.5207
DN mean=400.842, DN min=231, DN max=3329, DR(20MP)=10.104, DR(8MP)=10.765 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 8000
stdev: R=20.4746, G1=16.1918, G2=16.0471, B=18.9092, RGGB=18.0141, R+G1+G2+B=18.0031
DN mean=400.539, DN min=141, DN max=3435, DR(20MP)=9.79394, DR(8MP)=10.4549 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 10000
stdev: R=20.9024, G1=16.5844, G2=16.3452, B=19.2282, RGGB=18.3809, R+G1+G2+B=18.3633
DN mean=401.118, DN min=131, DN max=4795, DR(20MP)=9.76531, DR(8MP)=10.4263 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 12800
stdev: R=26.3622, G1=20.8879, G2=20.6016, B=24.2504, RGGB=23.1724, R+G1+G2+B=23.1504
DN mean=400.571, DN min=6, DN max=6136, DR(20MP)=9.43114, DR(8MP)=10.0921 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 16000
stdev: R=32.9796, G1=26.1062, G2=25.7258, B=30.3436, RGGB=28.9549, R+G1+G2+B=28.9471
DN mean=400.914, DN min=4, DN max=7576, DR(20MP)=9.10873, DR(8MP)=9.7697 clippedNoise=0%

D5 ISO 20000
stdev: R=41.8175, G1=33.1518, G2=32.6393, B=38.367, RGGB=36.7031, R+G1+G2+B=36.6916
DN mean=400.543, DN min=0, DN max=8716, DR(20MP)=8.76673, DR(8MP)=9.4277 clippedNoise=0.000105682%

D5 ISO 25600
stdev: R=52.6647, G1=41.7058, G2=41.1119, B=48.3539, RGGB=46.2331, R+G1+G2+B=46.2094
DN mean=400.584, DN min=0, DN max=12061, DR(20MP)=8.43399, DR(8MP)=9.09496 clippedNoise=0.00129701%

D5 ISO 32000
stdev: R=65.8257, G1=52.1854, G2=51.3927, B=60.5148, RGGB=57.7926, R+G1+G2+B=57.7918
DN mean=401.7, DN min=0, DN max=15115, DR(20MP)=8.11121, DR(8MP)=8.77218 clippedNoise=0.00631691%

D5 ISO 40000
stdev: R=83.4153, G1=66.1556, G2=65.1758, B=76.4404, RGGB=73.3033, R+G1+G2+B=73.1876
DN mean=400.78, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=7.77056, DR(8MP)=8.43153 clippedNoise=0.0234854%

D5 ISO 51200
stdev: R=104.806, G1=83.2891, G2=82.0185, B=95.8216, RGGB=91.9823, R+G1+G2+B=91.9649
DN mean=400.806, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=7.44108, DR(8MP)=8.10204 clippedNoise=0.0652539%

D5 ISO 64000
stdev: R=131.201, G1=104.298, G2=102.583, B=119.635, RGGB=115.093, R+G1+G2+B=115.03
DN mean=398.362, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=7.11844, DR(8MP)=7.77941 clippedNoise=0.157317%

D5 ISO 81275
stdev: R=164.757, G1=131.482, G2=129.205, B=150.067, RGGB=144.761, R+G1+G2+B=144.608
DN mean=401.17, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=6.78805, DR(8MP)=7.44901 clippedNoise=0.427892%

D5 ISO 102400
stdev: R=204.578, G1=164.416, G2=161.397, B=186.534, RGGB=180.178, R+G1+G2+B=180.09
DN mean=402.389, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=6.47137, DR(8MP)=7.13234 clippedNoise=1.32202%

D5 ISO 128000
stdev: R=244.094, G1=199.714, G2=196.468, B=224.711, RGGB=217.166, R+G1+G2+B=217.119
DN mean=398.596, DN min=0, DN max=2925, DR(20MP)=6.20195, DR(8MP)=6.86291 clippedNoise=3.61336%

D5 ISO 162550
stdev: R=297.697, G1=244.791, G2=240.429, B=272.256, RGGB=265.024, R+G1+G2+B=264.8
DN mean=411.955, DN min=0, DN max=3715, DR(20MP)=5.91432, DR(8MP)=6.57529 clippedNoise=7.04966%

D5 ISO 204800
stdev: R=355.339, G1=294.563, G2=290.855, B=325.84, RGGB=317.922, R+G1+G2+B=317.727
DN mean=418.491, DN min=0, DN max=4832, DR(20MP)=5.65085, DR(8MP)=6.31181 clippedNoise=12.3816%

D5 ISO 409600
stdev: R=611.885, G1=503.257, G2=498.067, B=555.565, RGGB=544.894, R+G1+G2+B=544.149
DN mean=520.159, DN min=0, DN max=8632, DR(20MP)=4.86541, DR(8MP)=5.52638 clippedNoise=27.8831%

D5 ISO 819200
stdev: R=1085.85, G1=891.777, G2=857.551, B=951.801, RGGB=952.748, R+G1+G2+B=950.745
DN mean=751.106, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=4.0392, DR(8MP)=4.70016 clippedNoise=39.4155%

D5 ISO 1638400
stdev: R=2008.16, G1=1651.94, G2=1574.78, B=1766.51, RGGB=1761.35, R+G1+G2+B=1757.99
DN mean=1266.57, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=3.10402, DR(8MP)=3.76499 clippedNoise=45.1751%

D5 ISO 3276800
stdev: R=3631.49, G1=3019.72, G2=2855.41, B=3409.65, RGGB=3251.47, R+G1+G2+B=3243.67
DN mean=2208.21, DN min=0, DN max=16383, DR(20MP)=2.12753, DR(8MP)=2.78849 clippedNoise=49.8048%


Edited on Apr 03, 2016 at 05:22 PM · View previous versions



Mar 29, 2016 at 12:56 AM
nntnam
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Amazing work! Thank you for doing this.


Mar 29, 2016 at 03:23 AM
dehowie
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Great stuff well put together.
Thanks.



Mar 29, 2016 at 04:08 AM
milkod2001
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Very lovely graphs and numbers. Any chance for real world pictures side by side at different ISO settings,even brick walls?


Mar 29, 2016 at 04:46 AM
PhilDrinkwater
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Thanks for doing this. It's interesting - last generation they switched too. Canon had the studio cameras (5d2) and Nikon the event cameras (d700, d3) and the d800 and 5d3 switched this.

They're just enviously going for each other's makets each time it seems!

(I know Nikon has a d750 now, but I still think that's a bit prosumer..)



Mar 29, 2016 at 06:54 AM
big country
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


No data matters until DXO says how crappy the canon sensor is and how great the nikon sensor is.


Mar 29, 2016 at 07:30 AM
Schlotkins
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


I guess it really depends on how often you shoot at each ISO but... I'd rather have the 1DX2 graph. The D5 is only going to probably be noticeably better 12800+


Mar 29, 2016 at 09:01 AM
PhilDrinkwater
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


I just looked at the dpreview article about the d5, and it's really funny to see them showing normally exposed pictures and saying "yes, it's so rubbish that it could only take this". Which is what Canon used have been saying for years

I'm glad I largely ignore this stuff and just focus on what *I* need from my camera, not what others might need.



Mar 29, 2016 at 10:40 AM
KSgal
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Thank you very much for the comparison I've been looking for, cgarcia!

I see all these graphs and such and I guess my question is..

Will I see a difference of 0.5 EVA at high ISO, in pictures after processing

Is it visible at 8x10? 16x20? or 30x40?



Mar 29, 2016 at 02:00 PM
cgarcia
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


KSgal wrote:
Thank you very much for the comparison I've been looking for, cgarcia!

I see all these graphs and such and I guess my question is..

Will I see a difference of 0.5 EVA at high ISO, in pictures after processing

Is it visible at 8x10? 16x20? or 30x40?


I assume that this depends more on the shot (if properly exposed) or the scene DR.

Anyway if you are the typical 1DX shooter you shouldn't be looking to upgrade only just for the low ISO increased DR...



Mar 29, 2016 at 08:13 PM
Pixel Perfect
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


PhilDrinkwater wrote:
I just looked at the dpreview article about the d5, and it's really funny to see them showing normally exposed pictures and saying "yes, it's so rubbish that it could only take this". Which is what Canon used have been saying for years

I'm glad I largely ignore this stuff and just focus on what *I* need from my camera, not what others might need.


What's really sad is seeing Sony's #1 fanboy Rishi bashing Nikon in every post and trotting out the A7RII and D7200 on how to have your cake and eat it too. Too bad he hasn't tried doing long exposures at high ISO on his A7RII.



Mar 29, 2016 at 09:45 PM
ggreene
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


I find Rishi amusing. One of the top DRones out there. Good for a laugh now and then especially when he gets involved in the comment section.


Mar 29, 2016 at 10:39 PM
Stoffer
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


ggreene wrote:
I find Rishi amusing. One of the top DRones out there. Good for a laugh now and then especially when he gets involved in the comment section.


Ah, that Rishi fellow! Gregory, good on you that you can look at the bright side.

I do, however, find him very tiresome at times. And I even have a Sony A7rII and enjoy its high DR, so I guess that is a sign that he just cant contain himself (for a lack of a better word).



Mar 30, 2016 at 01:08 AM
bernardl
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Interesting, thanks!

On a different note, I did some AF tests today with the D5+24-70 f2.8 VR on fast approaching trains slowing down and seemingly got 100% focused images at 12fps in both single and group AF modes.

The AF did not hunt a single time, straight to perfect focus on static and moving subjects. I have never felt this degree of confidence/reliability/peace of mind with any other AF system before.

I did tests in low light also and got some failures there, but similar to what I would get with manual focus. Meaning slightly oof, but never completely off.

This is the main reason why I bought this camera and so far I am not disapointed.

cheers,
Bernard



Mar 30, 2016 at 03:38 AM
macrobild
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Nice work, and the numbers goes well with Bclaff, Marianne Oelund etc etc figures, why Nikon chose a sensor with high read-out noise at ISO base in D5 beats me, heat, 4K video, made with their own IP ?

why not walked on with higher resolution and the same architecture as in the Sony 7S with low read out noise at base iso and very fine high iso properties



Mar 30, 2016 at 04:11 AM
macrobild
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Pixel Perfect wrote:
What's really sad is seeing Sony's #1 fanboy Rishi bashing Nikon in every post and trotting out the A7RII and D7200 on how to have your cake and eat it too. Too bad he hasn't tried doing long exposures at high ISO on his A7RII.


well I think Rishi know how and experience of testing sensors is much bigger than yours
and they how can not understand the benefits of a large DR at base iso are often Canon shooters



Mar 30, 2016 at 04:31 AM
ggreene
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


Stoffer wrote:
Ah, that Rishi fellow! Gregory, good on you that you can look at the bright side.
I do, however, find him very tiresome at times. And I even have a Sony A7rII and enjoy its high DR, so I guess that is a sign that he just cant contain himself (for a lack of a better word).


Don't get me wrong, I think Sony is great for the market. I think Canikon needs the kick in the pants and hope Sony releases a pro body taking on the D5 and 1DX2. Sony fanboi's though are pure comedy gold. Rishi should have a Youtube channel. He could give DigitalRev a run for their money.

Haha, the sock puppet returns.



Mar 30, 2016 at 08:04 AM
jcolwell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


macrobild wrote:
...and they how can not understand the benefits of a large DR at base iso are often Canon shooters


I disagree. I think everybody who follows modern photo technology knows that higher DR offers real benefits for many situations. OTOH, for many people, those benefits are not sufficiently important to make them buy a camera that has higher DR.



Mar 30, 2016 at 10:13 AM
JaimitoFrog
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


macrobild wrote:
well I think Rishi know how and experience of testing sensors is much bigger than yours
and they how can not understand the benefits of a large DR at base iso are often Canon shooters


He is a good techie and they do good comparisons. But he is not a great photographer.



Mar 30, 2016 at 04:14 PM
macrobild
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · Canon 1DX2/1DX and Nikon D5 ISO war (from RAWs)


More interesting is to discuss is WHY Nikon chose the sensor inside D5??
why not use the same type of sensor that Sony has in their cameras , 42Mp BSI and with bigger pixels and 20MP or a further development of 12Mp sensor with column ADC up to 20MP, if now 20MP is a holy grail for sport photo=12-14 pictures/sec.Both have excellent low and high iso DR

I love to hear an explanation from Nikon



Mar 30, 2016 at 04:32 PM
       2       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account