Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews
FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Upload & Sell   
Search Used
1
2
3 end
  

Archive 2004 · Weight of camera not an issue!
  
 
Pondria
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Weight of camera not an issue!


He doesn't have straps on the big lenses. So he is using the bodies just for carry-on straps.


Sep 22, 2004 at 12:57 AM
Pondria
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Weight of camera not an issue!


Pondria wrote:
He doesn't have straps on the big lenses. So he is using the bodies just for carry-on straps.

No I was wrong.
I think his colleagues went to bathroom.


Sep 22, 2004 at 12:58 AM
DavidP
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Weight of camera not an issue!


Check out this larger image:

http://www.pbase.com/ssmithx/image/33879151/original

Man, those lenses are BEAT UP!

What's the number for lens abuse?

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:01 AM
franzdom
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Weight of camera not an issue!


mark1958 wrote:
i hope a mugger does not cross his path.. how fast can he run


Cameras may not be the only thing he can shoot with!

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:09 AM
KapHn8d™
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Weight of camera not an issue!


awesome

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:13 AM
charlesk
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #6 · Weight of camera not an issue!


At least one of those is a film camera. Explains the proliferation of bodies a bit. --c

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:26 AM
franzdom
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Weight of camera not an issue!


So this is where the craziness leads to?

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:33 AM
GSteele
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Weight of camera not an issue!


FOR SALE: Canon 500mm f4. Lightly used, clean glass, some brassing on the outside, but doesn't affect operation. Extra duct tape, no charge.

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:47 AM
jeffH70
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · Weight of camera not an issue!


charlesk wrote:
At least one of those is a film camera. Explains the proliferation of bodies a bit. --c


Actually, ALL his bodies are film ones, which explains why he needed all five of them.

Jeff

Sep 22, 2004 at 02:18 AM
keithchan
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Weight of camera not an issue!


JoeArndt wrote:
Guy Mancuso wrote:
That is just stupid.


Funny. Given your lust for the big bodies (camera bodies), when I first saw this picture I was wondering whether the guy was you.




Guy would be the one with all the primes. And a 1Ds, 1Ds2, and 1D2 because he can't decide!

Sep 22, 2004 at 03:21 AM
FLECOM
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #11 · Weight of camera not an issue!


what boggles me is all his cameras are Canon's and all the straps are Nikons? wtf?

Sep 22, 2004 at 03:39 AM
FLECOM
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #12 · Weight of camera not an issue!


am i the only one that finds it ironic that pic was taken with a d70? lol

Sep 22, 2004 at 03:42 AM
Vance
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · Weight of camera not an issue!


JoeArndt wrote:
John Power wrote:
Is he a pro?


Good question.

It's probably some guy who posts regularly on dpreview.com taking a picture of his cat.



Oh man...had me on the floor

Sep 22, 2004 at 03:55 AM
 



FLECOM
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Weight of camera not an issue!


err double post

Sep 22, 2004 at 03:58 AM
Ron Warren
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Weight of camera not an issue!


Some how it is always the little guys who kick but.

Sep 22, 2004 at 04:02 AM
EB-1
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #16 · Weight of camera not an issue!


How could anyone hold a camera still under that load? He is no kid either. I like the RS, remember them? I wonder about the messed up lens hood; it must block the field of view. I also like the monopod - nice...

EB

Sep 22, 2004 at 04:43 AM
powerdrive
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #17 · Weight of camera not an issue!


I may be crazy but I like to see that hard used gear.
It's not that I like the abuse of equipment but just seeing that stuff kind of tells a story all by itself. I can only wonder how many pictures taken with those "trashed" lenses have graced the same magazines we love.

It's something like the way some people treat a Bible, I know many who treat it so "reverently" that it never sees the light of day and others who think nothing of marking all over it as they read and re-read it. The latter seem more interested in the content and use of the "tool".

I am one of those who also loved seeing tattered flags after 9/11 because you KNEW they were flying on 9/10 and before. Their wear to me does not represent disrespect for the flag but rather lasting patriatism.

O.K. I'll get down now.. The soap box is starting to buckle under my ever increasing weight.

Sep 22, 2004 at 05:06 AM
AJ Nadershahi
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #18 · Weight of camera not an issue!


The duct tape is pretty obvious. But I'm having trouble finding the bubble gum. It's probably what's keeping the monopod attached to that big lens.

Sep 22, 2004 at 06:20 AM
AJ Nadershahi
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · Weight of camera not an issue!


This guys worst nightmare is probably to be sent out on assignment with just one camera fitted with a standard lens.

Sep 22, 2004 at 06:22 AM
gunblue
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #20 · Weight of camera not an issue!


I bet he's a caddie for golf photographers. Is there a job like that? Hehehe!

Sep 22, 2004 at 06:46 AM
gunblue
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #21 · Weight of camera not an issue!


what boggles me is all his cameras are Canon's and all the straps are Nikons? wtf?

This shows Nikon is really better than Canon... strapwise.

Sep 22, 2004 at 06:59 AM
mickr7an
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #22 · Weight of camera not an issue!


"Tony was new to the paparazzi job and couldn't understand how Jack Nicholson spotted him so quickly."

Sep 22, 2004 at 07:02 AM
JoeArndt
Offline
Account Locked
p.2 #23 · Weight of camera not an issue!


powerdrive wrote:
I may be crazy but I like to see that hard used gear.
It's not that I like the abuse of equipment but just seeing that stuff kind of tells a story all by itself. I can only wonder how many pictures taken with those "trashed" lenses have graced the same magazines we love.

It's something like the way some people treat a Bible, I know many who treat it so "reverently" that it never sees the light of day and others who think nothing of marking all over it as they read and re-read it. The latter seem more interested in the content and use of the "tool".

I am one of those who also loved seeing tattered flags after 9/11 because you KNEW they were flying on 9/10 and before. Their wear to me does not represent disrespect for the flag but rather lasting patriatism.

O.K. I'll get down now.. The soap box is starting to buckle under my ever increasing weight.


My bible is well used. Part of one leg of a bookcase broke off some time ago, and the bible is propping the bookcase up. My sense is that if everyone use their bibles for such useful purposes, there'd be a lot less trouble in the world.

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:07 PM
Gi.Joe
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #24 · Weight of camera not an issue!


Anybody should say him, that Canon makes a 28-300 L ?!?!

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:14 PM
mmsean
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #25 · Weight of camera not an issue!


Wow JoeArndt, you're sounding a viligent bible thumper

Sep 22, 2004 at 01:39 PM




FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Upload & Sell
1
2
3 end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost your password?