Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2013 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?

  
 
OntheRez
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


I recently acquired a lightly used Oly OM-D (Thanks, JR). Like the camera very much though I'm still learning my way around it. Since I shoot 1D(s) professionally my fingers already think they know what they are doing. Of course, they're wrong

I have a Pany 20mm f/1.7 on it and it makes for a small, nice IQ camera. I'm looking for something in the way of a fast zoom for more flexibility and have been considering the Pany 12-35 f/2.8 as it would be a fast "normal" zoom. Photozone likes the lens well enough but is critical of its edge sharpness and higher than normal CA. On a Pany cam this is largely corrected in camera, but of course the Oly doesn't do this. Their conclusion was that it is a nice lens, but doubted that it was really worth its lofty price.

So, are any of you using this in real world work? I recognize that Photozone largely does a technical analysis so it's possible that their concerns aren't important in the field. I did examine their full size images and even when shot with a Pany cam the CA is visible in some situations and the shot of the cathedral is distorted at least to my eye.

Would really appreciate feedback from users as on paper the lens is exactly what I need.

Robert



Jun 08, 2013 at 11:19 AM
jhinkey
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Been using mine on my GH-2 for a while now and as an owner of a D800 + a lot of excellent FX glass (primes and zooms) I must say that I'm very very happy with it.

I bought mine for use as a light weight/compact system for when the FX gear is either overkill or just too big/heavy. The sharpness is great at all focal lengths on my copy and it's pretty even across the frame. CA is a non-factor as it gets corrected by the RAW converters quite well. The OIS works pretty well and the lens works very well in video mode too (though I don't use it much for video).

Overall extremely happy with it, especially when I got it for $200 off when bundled with a new deeply discounted GH-2 a while back . . .


















Jun 08, 2013 at 01:07 PM
jhinkey
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


And to follow up - here's some examples of the sharpness from my copy that I'm getting with standard processing in CS6.

I tested the 35-100/2.8 the other day and the 12-35/2.8 seems to be much sharper at 35mm than the 35-100/2.8 (which is very very sharp at 100mm).

There is always copy-to-copy variation in lenses, so perhaps I was lucky enough to get an exceptional copy.

Hope this helps.

John





Full Frame Image @35mm







100% Crop







Another 100% Crop




Jun 08, 2013 at 01:12 PM
OntheRez
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


John,

Certainly nothing to sneeze at in these examples. Really like the fist pix. LIke you I'm looking for lightweight, portable, carry always. Strapping a 1D on is a bit like going to war.

Robert



Jun 08, 2013 at 02:03 PM
CalW
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Robert, I certainly like mine This photo was taken last autumn shortly after I received the lens. When rendered by the latest Photo Ninja beta, the CA painlessly goes away and the detail just pops. I really think that this lens on an E-M5 is better in every way than my former Canon 24-70 f/2.8L on a 1Ds Mark II. This is a full-width crop, not a stitch. Prints nicely at 10x18. I'm sure it will look the same at 12x22 when I get new paper, and I'll have it in a frame for my holiday shows later this year.



© CalW 2013

Camel's Hump Vista, Starksboro, VT




Jun 08, 2013 at 07:09 PM
OntheRez
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Cal,
D*mn. I used to do a lot of shooting with a 24-70 on a 1DsII (now on a 1DsIII) so I know what the combo can do. Frankly it was one of the all time best. So this is impressive. I getting closer to pulling the trigger.

Rober



Jun 08, 2013 at 07:52 PM
deadwolfbones
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Been using one in the office for product photography and it does a stellar job. It was used for all the shots in this gallery, for instance (on the GH3):

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/sony-hdr-pj650v-camcorder-review/gallery?attachment=0&tags=product




Jun 08, 2013 at 10:17 PM
noohoggin1
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · p.1 #8 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


If it helps, I used to shoot with 5D Classic/7D with the 24-70mm/2.8 L for work. Now I shoot with OMD with the 12-35mm/2.8, and never looked back. Just as happy with it. Buy and enjoy!


Jun 08, 2013 at 11:17 PM
adam613
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · p.1 #9 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


I went through exactly the same thought process. I bit the bullet and bought an OM-D and a 12-35 the other day...I haven't taken a lot of shots with it yet, but what I have taken so far clearly shows that "pop" (commonly referred to as microcontrast) that PhotoZone doesn't measure. CA is an issue, but one that can be fixed in postprocessing. This is a lens that is better in real life than on paper (as opposed to the Panasonic 20 f/1.7, which I found better on paper than in real life).

I'm waiting for some decent weather so I can take some real shots, but meanwhile, here's the first pic I took (of some gear I'm selling to recoup the cost), straight out of camera. Shot RAW, default settings in UFRaw, saved as JPEG in Gimp.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/adamtrilling/8995942461/



Jun 09, 2013 at 09:49 AM
OntheRez
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · p.1 #10 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


NooHoggin,

Never shot the 5D but I like many people (including Cal above) really like the 24-70 f/2.8. Both of you are reporting equal or better results with the 12-35 on full frame cameras. That's real positive.

Adam,
I think your shots along with Cal's are clinchers. It would be really hard to criticize your shots on any level. Sure they're in a controlled environment, but that merely shows off what the lens (and camera) can do. Photozone makes no bones about the limits of what it does which is why they're valuable, but I kept suspecting that there was more to this lens than the numbers. CA can generally be fixed without a lot of work. PZ claims the fix will be "lossy" but I wonder if that will really matter much. Do those of you who are shooting this find softness in the corners wide up at either extreme? PZ's measurements suggest this, but again, what does it feel like in real light?

Robert





Jun 09, 2013 at 11:42 AM
CalW
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · p.1 #11 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Robert, the corners in my 12-35 are noticeably better than the corners were in my 24-70 on full frame. I purchased the 24-70 when I was using a 20D, and later used it on a 1DII. It was a shock to see how bad the corners were when I got the 1DsII. Of course it is possible that my 24-70 was poorer than some, but at the time it seemed acceptable to me, and the new owner is happy with it. Thus my comment above that the 12-35 appears to be "better in every way." (Excepting that the depth of field is different, of course, before someone jumps on me for that!) But yes, there is some minor, generally unobjectionable, loss of resolution in the corners with the 12-35. For what it may be worth, of course, the 12mm Oly, 25mm Pany, and either 45mm prime are all better than the 12-35. But for travel and walk-about the 12-35 is convenient and clearly (I believe) better than any other m43 "normal" range zoom.


Jun 09, 2013 at 01:18 PM
noohoggin1
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · p.1 #12 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


In my experience, there is VERY minor softness as you move away from center--but it wasn't worse than my 24-70. Cal said his 12-35mm was better than his 24-70; mine wasn't better, but it was the same as my 24-70mm. Which is still saying something..! I loved it, and now I love my "mini" 24-70mm that I could put in my jacket pocket easily.


Jun 09, 2013 at 05:54 PM
BassRock
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · p.1 #13 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


The 12-35 is an excellent lens and matched with the 35-100 f/2.8 makes for a wonderful lightweight system. I use both a lot with my Panny GH3 which probably has the same sensor as the OM-D. My simple summary is that my GH3 with 12-35 is the equal of my older Nikon D700 with 24-120, but a bit behind the IQ of the newer FF Nikons. However, I am happy to forgo a small bit of IQ for a much reduced bulk to carry. My only complaint about the 12-35 is that I find it a bit short after using the longer Nikon 24-120. It would be great if it was 12-60 Here a few recent pictures with the 12-35 and more can be found here http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/gh3 and here http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/my_life

http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/image/150680407/original.jpg
http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/image/148178107/original.jpg
http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/image/149910554/original.jpg
http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/image/149816065/original.jpg
http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/image/149136526/original.jpg




Jun 10, 2013 at 01:43 AM
adam613
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · p.1 #14 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


OntheRez wrote:
Adam,
I think your shots along with Cal's are clinchers. It would be really hard to criticize your shots on any level. Sure they're in a controlled environment, but that merely shows off what the lens (and camera) can do.


For me, the shock was not so much what the lens can do, but what the lens can do in the hands of a photographer with limited product photography skills on a completely unfamiliar camera! I'm excited to see what this combo can do for me once I really learn how to use it...maybe I'll get shots as good as some of the others in this thread.

For my next trick, I'll find a daily messenger bag that has a padded space for the camera...I found a nice backpack that can hold my entire kit including a tripod, but I'm not carrying that around all of the time.



Jun 10, 2013 at 08:38 AM
FlyPenFly
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · p.1 #15 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


BassRock wrote:
The 12-35 is an excellent lens and matched with the 35-100 f/2.8 makes for a wonderful lightweight system. I use both a lot with my Panny GH3 which probably has the same sensor as the OM-D. My simple summary is that my GH3 with 12-35 is the equal of my older Nikon D700 with 24-120, but a bit behind the IQ of the newer FF Nikons. However, I am happy to forgo a small bit of IQ for a much reduced bulk to carry. My only complaint about the 12-35 is that I find it a bit short after using
...Show more

This one is brilliant. The foreground details seem a bit mushed though but maybe it was the extended exposure and the wind.



Jun 10, 2013 at 08:56 AM
OntheRez
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · p.1 #16 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


John, Cal, Adam, et. al.,

Okay, it's all you guy's fault but I coughed up every reserve I had and ordered from B&H yesterday. I found sellers in Japan and HK that priced it at about $975USD + expensive shipping and decided that having a USA warranty and B&H's reputation was persuasive. It should arrive about Thursday. I'll post some of my first experiences with it.

Thanks a lot guys for putting me back in the lens poorhouse

Robert



Jun 10, 2013 at 09:00 AM
serhan_
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · p.1 #17 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Enjoy your new lens

I haven't posted much from this lens, one 14image pano from BC last year:
http://www.pbase.com/sc_20170/image/148663703/original.jpg



Jun 10, 2013 at 09:31 AM
noohoggin1
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · p.1 #18 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Enjoy it when you get it! Like yourself, I had considered ordering from overseas to save money as well, but opted to go through B&H with their stellar reputation. Post pics when you can!


Jun 10, 2013 at 11:18 AM
BassRock
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · p.1 #19 · Pany 12-35 f/2.8: Users?


Hi, FlyPenPly (great name !). Thank you for the compliment. I agree the details are a bit lost. This is the first time I used the Lee Big Stopper on the GH3 and 12-35. I had focussed on the small building (look out post) but it was a very cold day and I didn't spend enough time and attention getting set up, and the tripod properly stable, so there probably was some movement. Also, the high compression for the low rez jpg doesn't help maintain the details. I keep meaning to got back out with the Big Stopper and experiment some more. Here is another from the same day, same spot but looking to the right.

http://www.pbase.com/bassrock/image/148178079/large.jpg



Jun 11, 2013 at 01:38 AM





FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username       Or Reset password



This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.