fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2013 · Two portraits - different lighting

  
 
Ernie Aubert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Two portraits - different lighting


Here are a couple portraits incorporating lighting suggestions from earlier posts here. Any observations on these?

1 http://photos.imageevent.com/bhakti_rider/900pixelfilesforfm/temp/0W1B0850.jpg

2 http://photos.imageevent.com/bhakti_rider/900pixelfilesforfm/temp/0W1B0851.jpg



Apr 05, 2013 at 09:06 AM
Bob Jarman
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Two portraits - different lighting


Not really qualified to comment, especially on lighting setup, but they look awfully 'flat', aka, 2-dimensional to me re subject and background.

Bob



Apr 05, 2013 at 09:31 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Two portraits - different lighting


+1 @ Bob.

Not a lot of shadow to give us any modeling cues in the second one. The first one would be my preference. That, and the on axis key light is creating specular highlights off the forehead/nose in both. Angling/relocating off axis may help with that. This is part of what a beauty dish is designed to prevent when used in an on axis manner.



Apr 05, 2013 at 12:00 PM
Travis Rhoads
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · Two portraits - different lighting


they do seem flat, the position of the subject is part of the problem. They are standing square shouldered to the camera. A slight angle of the shoulders with the head turned is much more dynamic. The light is also a bit too bright to me, there is no depth created when you get some shadows.


Apr 05, 2013 at 01:03 PM
cgardner
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Two portraits - different lighting


Both are well executed centered key light / butterfly lighting pattern portraits.

You also did a good job of keeping the facial angle symmetrical by aiming the camera at the nose, but if the camera was higher relative to the face by about 5-6" the view of the face would be more flattering and less like an eye level mug shot. A trick I use with older subjects to tighten the neck is to have them look up. Then I adjust the lighting as needed to the adjusted orientation of the tilted-up face, and then stand on a step stool to get above the eye line with the camera.

Not all faces are ideally suited for full face poses with centered lighting. A "telltale" I use for determining if a face symmetrical or not is to point the camera straight at the nose and then look to see if the ears appear the same size. Here the ears and other things tell me the faces aren't perfectly symmetrical. That's not a showstopper, but there are better lighting strategies which make asymmetry less obvious.

The full face / centered key light combination only works ideally for slim, naturally symmetrical faces. If the face is asymmetrical its better to put the key light to the side, but on the narrower side of the face for a full face pose. When a full face pose is lit from the side the highlighted side will seem bigger; it's an optical illusion. So when the face is asymmetrical and a full face pose is required highlighting the narrower side will make the face look more balanced in the photo.

A "short" lit oblique view creates a similar illusion because only the front "mask" of the face gets highlights in a way that makes even a very lopsided face look more balanced. See this tutorial of mine that illustrates that using my lopsided mug: http://photo.nova.org/Mirror/



Apr 05, 2013 at 06:03 PM





FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account