I would like to see a comparison with Zeiss 100/2 for bokeh. While the 100/2 is not the very best corrected lens for LoCA, the bokeh seems to be a little smoother (because of that?).
Anyone used this lens for landscape-type stuff yet? I almost got the 100/2MP for such work (it's the sharpest lens across the frame I've seen at 100mm, even wide open it's excellent), but I have other, smaller, lighter, less costly options at 100mm.
I love my 135mm/2 AIS Nikkor, but it needs a lot of stopping down to get sharp across the frame and f/2 is tough to focus because of the residual aberrations.
jhinkey wrote:
Anyone used this lens for landscape-type stuff yet? I almost got the 100/2MP for such work (it's the sharpest lens across the frame I've seen at 100mm, even wide open it's excellent), but I have other, smaller, lighter, less costly options at 100mm.
I love my 135mm/2 AIS Nikkor, but it needs a lot of stopping down to get sharp across the frame and f/2 is tough to focus because of the residual aberrations.
- John
Ill try to get some for you , but I'm not an expert :-( , ill try to do my best ;-)
I will see what I can do for you. I wont be hiking anytime soon. You have the same weather I do just 166 miles south However, let me say this. The lens is great but I will not be taking it with me next time I hit the Goat Rocks or the Enchantments. It's big and heavy.
!
(and affordable too).
However, let me say this. The lens is great but I will not be taking it with me next time I hit the Goat Rocks or the Enchantments. It's big and heavy.