Upload & Sell: On
It's not just the 14mm. Its the corner sharpness, the F2.8, lack of distortion and contrast that rivals the Zeiss 15mm and the Zeiss 21mm. It may be more expensive than the 16-35mm, but for many, it is the better option.
Glad the 16-35mm is wide enough for you, but for many of us, 14mm is sometimes not wide enough. . Plus, when you correct for distortion, your left with around a 15-16mm image.
Not sure what kind of image you would be left with if you corrected for distortion on the 16-35mm. I have heard it has pretty bad distortion,...Show more →
I actually shoot with the 17-35 2.8, got the best of both worlds. Tack sharp, fast and relatively low distortion. There are times I wish it were wider though, for architecture & real estate. However I almost always use a circular polarizer when shooting exteriors, so I make do with 17mm. That is still pretty dang wide.