birdied wrote:
Thanks Eric ! It would be much easier if they were larger and didn't move so fast I have soooooo many shots of whatever the subject looking the wrong way or moving away . All in the trial and error , right !
Not to worry, did not get too wet . Thanks again .
Thanks for the kind words Tom ! I wish they were excellent, but they were fun . I have never seen a harrier before these showed up.
Oh I do try and look on the bright side Glad you liked the red tail.
Thanks Ron ! In the hierarchy of progression what happened to 4. Is that the step where you can't believe it is all coming together I keep bouncing between 1 , 2 and 3 !
Birdie- Good baby steps on your first harrier images.
your "learning curve" on other subjects has been so rapid and so good, that you'll probably soon be regaling us with harrier images where we suggest you back up occasionally to include more context .
Love the re-do on the big ship (#1).
Charlie
Feb 02, 2013 at 08:41 PM
David Leask Offline Upload & Sell: Off
Thanks ! Tried your suggestion and moved the bird. Like it better
Nice, I like it.
acjd wrote:
Is this a photoshop thing? As you said, if the bird wasn't there than it isn't there. Confused.
Yes, it's a photoshop thing. Since the background behind the bird was so uniform, it's pretty easy to just clone it into another part of the frame. As I said, a lot of purists will say it's cheating, and there's some validity to that I guess, but it's a nice exercise anyway.