Upload & Sell: Off
| p.4 #2 · Olympus OM-D vs NEX-6 |
Makten, why don't you post up some real photos that show this blow away colour with the NEX that cannot be achieved with the Olympus. I just don't see it...maybe some examples rather than words would be better.
I haven't said anything about NEX "blow away colors". I only said I liked it better, and if none of you see what I don't like with the OM-D images, you won't see what I liked with the NEX for sure.
Zeiss color and micro-contrast may be marginally better than Zuiko glass, and Leica glass is definitely better than Zeiss glass (you get what you pay for, right?) ... but we are now talking about the glass and not about the sensor. You can stick any lens on the OM-D if you have a preference for a color palette from a particular brand ... be it Leica, Voigtlander (my personal choice/preference), Zeiss, Canon or Nikon. You don't have to stick with µ43 lenses. The most expensive µ43 Zuiko prime lens cost less than $1,000. How much is Leica and Voigtlander and Zeiss glass? I will take the µ43 AF Zuiko prime lens any day, thank you!
I've tried some expensive Leica and Zeiss glass on the OM-D. It didn't do anything with the colors, I just got worse sharpness than with the 12/2 and 25/1.4, which was expected.
I don't like the 6D shots either, so it's probably more about your PP.