PetKal wrote:
"Will 24-70L compliment my 70-200 f/4 ?" are no fun.
mitesh wrote:
Peter,
I'm not sure what's wrong with this question? I have found that the 24-70 offers improved social grace compared to the 24-105. I'm sure it would be the perfect mate for a 70-200.
jcolwell wrote:
"Compliment" is spelled incorrectly. It should be "complement".
Why is it so hard to answer the op's question......
canon 5d, 17-40L, 35L, sigma 50 1.4,sigma 85 1.4, 200 2.8L, 430ex x's 3, Phottix Odins, Various modifiers.....Soon hope to add 6D or D600. Process files on an IMac using CS5
I live in Nova Scotia. That's prety much terrible humidity from Spring through Fall. I use a dry cabinet that's branded CameraStorage.com, but they appear to be out of business. It looks exactly like this product, in fact in probably is:
carnac wrote:
Does it bug anyone else when someone uses "gears" for plural?
You're not alone. One member who shall remain nameless (because someone else already mentioned him) continues to do so out of some perverse need to be deliberately irritating.
I used to post this image when I came across improper usage, but I've pretty much given up:
PetKal wrote:
Jim, "gears" is fun.
However, things like "Will 24-70L compliment my 70-200 f/4 ?" are no fun.
Well, I thought it was quite fun watching all the praise my 24-70L gave my 70-200 f/4. The 24-70 is well known to be a most gracious and humble lens. I could tell the 70-200 f/4 was really eating it up. It was all .
The coolest thing is, I still own a Canon product so I can totally post here
-----
Ye Auld Gears List of the Year of Our Lord MMXIII as written by he who swaps systems as often as a bar wench belches, Jereminus Smithicus
Cameras
Canon S95 with small dent near lens
Olympus OM-D with missing EVF cup.
Panasonic GX-1 with custom leatherette wrap
Sony NEX-5N
Lenses
Minolta
600mm f/5.6 with original caps and crate
58mm f/1.4 with almost none of the original operation because I screwed up the reassembly
35-70 f/3.5 macro with the most awesome bokeh on the planet
24mm f/2.8 that I should probably sell because it just sits there
Minolta MD to m43 adapter
Minolta MD to NEX adapter
PetKal wrote:
Let us see: pro-fly-gate......Jess, you really sure that wasn't an alien spaceship boarding gate ?
Are you really our old Jess ?
Peter, Peter, your etymological skills seem to be soaring with your birds...or is it those flies testing your entomological kills? Swat ever 'tis, I assure you that not only am I the same old changeling/clone you've always known, but I shall soon be officially old. And I am not a crook and I never hired those plumbers.
More gear, gears, gearz...please
Okay I'll be specific...6D w/grip, 24-70 f4L IS, 400 f5.6L, and other stuff...for now
But, before more photography things, a new 'perfectly working' spinal cord would be 1st on my list
