DonGut wrote:
#2 for me, and the last is a great shot also but appears to need a bit of NR. Don
Thank you Don,
I did noise reduction when I processed the last one though that was with old technology. I'll reprocess when I get a chance. Thank you for the suggestion
Morris- I was hoping it would poke its head and beak out so you could get more of the cute little guy- and then for #4 and #6 it did.
Huzzah! Nifty stuff.
Charlie
Charlie Shugart wrote:
Morris- I was hoping it would poke its head and beak out so you could get more of the cute little guy- and then for #4 and #6 it did.
Huzzah! Nifty stuff.
Charlie