Upload & Sell: On
| p.2 #3 · Third Party Collar for 70-200 F/4? |
Lee Saxon wrote:
Wow, it better be way better than the Nikon for almost the Nikon price. Is anyone really dissatisfied with the Nikon tripod collar?
Why? That doesn't make much sense to me.
- If the Nikon one is adequate for the job, and can be had for $159 in some places, then why spend more
- Nikon typically over-charges for such stuff, thus if someone is charging around the same amount for a replacement version it should be much better in some way to justify the cost
So, I have yet to find anyone reporting that the Nikon version does not work well except for making not a very nice sound when rotating it and the price being steep (though if in fact it can be had for $159 maybe that's not so bad if it's a solid support for this lens).
everyone has a different view. mine is if there is a considerably better design out there (and there is) and its within a margin for price along with the fact that there is none thats included with this lens i'll go with the one that is integrated with my attachment system. either way one goes the cost is approx within that margin the same use overall